Skip to main content

Becoming a professional software developer: Identity over skills

In my experience as a software architect working with developers, I’ve seen a common struggle: the inability to consistently apply good practices, like unit testing, refactoring, or writing clean code, especially when deadlines loom. At the start of a project, everyone’s committed to following best practices—writing tests, maintaining code quality, and ensuring scalability. But as the pressure of deadlines kicks in, those good intentions often get thrown overboard in favor of quick fixes and shortcuts.

What I’ve realized is that the real issue isn’t a lack of skill or knowledge; it’s a mindset problem. Developers may know what the best practices are, but they don’t always see themselves as the type of developer who religiously follows them, no matter the circumstances. This ties into an insight I gained from reading Atomic Habits by James Clear:

True change happens not when we aim to achieve specific goals, but when we shift our identity.

For developers, this means moving from “I need to write unit tests” to “I am the kind of developer who always writes unit tests.”


Identity Change Over Outcome Change

So if we want to be a professional software developer (or architect) that real, lasting change occurs when we shift our focus from what we want to achieve to who we want to become. It’s not about setting goals like “I want to learn a new programming language,” but about adopting the identity of a professional software developer.

This reframing pushes us to act consistently with that identity, which leads to better outcomes naturally.

The Importance of Small Wins in Reinforcing Identity

Every small action you take toward developing your craft as a software developer is a vote for your new identity. By reinforcing that identity through daily practice, such as writing code, reading documentation, or contributing to open-source projects, you're strengthening your belief in that identity.

So committing to write code daily, even for just 5 minutes, helps reinforce your identity as a consistent developer. Each commit(no pun intended), no matter how small, is a testament to your evolving skills and habits.

Build Systems, Not Just Set Goals

Clear advises focusing on systems rather than goals. As a software developer, the system is your daily habits—your commitment to learning, improving, and refining your skills.

Rather than setting a goal like “I want to learn Python in 3 months,” develop a system that helps you learn continuously, like dedicating 30 minutes a day to coding practice, or participating in coding challenges.

Align your Identity with Professional Growth

When your identity as a developer is firmly established, opportunities for growth—whether new roles, projects, or learning experiences—will align naturally with your habits. You won't need to force learning or discipline; they will come as part of who you are.

If you see yourself as a developer who excels at problem-solving and innovation, you’ll naturally gravitate toward challenging projects or learning new, cutting-edge technologies. It is not a coincidence that the Ideal Team Player is Hungry, Humble and Smart.

Let’s summarize

The path to becoming a successful software developer isn’t just about acquiring skills or achieving goals. It’s about adopting the mindset and habits of a professional. By shifting your identity to that of a disciplined, growth-oriented developer, you set the foundation for long-term success.

More information

Atomic Habits: Tiny Changes, Remarkable Results by James Clear

The Ideal Team Player | The Table Group

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...