Skip to main content

Url.ActionLink() is not thread-safe

I have an API that allows users to upload documents. To optimize the performance I save the documents to the database in parallel. After uploading has completed I return a list of URI's pointing to the document locations.

Here is what the code looks like:

As you can see in the code above, I combine a Task.WhenAll with a local function. Nothing special.

However when I executed this code under high load, I started to get errors back from the API. A look at the logs, showed the following exception:

Index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the collection. Parameter name: chunkLength

at System.Text.StringBuilder.ToString()

  at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Routing.UrlHelperBase.GenerateUrl(String protocol, String host, String path)

  at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Routing.EndpointRoutingUrlHelper.Action(UrlActionContext urlActionContext)

  at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.UrlHelperExtensions.ActionLink(IUrlHelper helper, String action, String controller, Object values, String protocol, String host, String fragment)

  at DocumentStorage.API.Controllers.DocumentsController.<UploadDocuments>g__UploadDocument|4_0(IFormFile document) in D:\b\3\_work\129\s\DocumentStorage\DocumentStorage.API\Controllers\DocumentsController.cs:line 53

  at DocumentStorage.API.Controllers.DocumentsController.UploadDocuments(List`1 documents)

It turns out that the Url.ActionLink() method is using a StringBuilder behind the scenes. And the StringBuilder is not thread-safe which brings us into trouble when we start using it in combination with the TPL.

To fix the threading issue I moved the url generation logic outside the parallel execution path:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...