Skip to main content

Monitor your application using Event Counters–Part I

I’m building a data pipeline using TPL Dataflow to migrate data from a database to an external API. As this data pipeline could run for a long time, I was looking for a good way to monitor the progress. This turned out to be a perfect use case for Event Counters.

What are EventCounters?

Here is what the documentation has to say about Event Counters:

EventCounters are .NET APIs used for lightweight, cross-platform, and near real-time performance metric collection. EventCounters were added as a cross-platform alternative to the "performance counters" of .NET Framework on Windows. EventCounters can be used to track various metrics.

And somewhat further in the documentation:

Apart from the EventCounters that are provided by the .NET runtime, you may choose to implement your own EventCounters.

And that is exactly what we are going to do!

Implement our first EventCounter

There are 4 types of counters that you can use each with their own characteristics and use cases:

We’ll start with a simple use case; with our first EventCounter we want to track the number of records that are migrated. So this should be an ever increasing number while the migration pipeline is running.

  • I start by creating a class that inherits from EventSource:
  • Next, we need to annotate this class with the [EventSource] attribute and specify a unique name:
  • We foresee a static instance of our class and a variable that can be used to track the number of migrated records:
  • For this use case, I start by using the PollingCounter and keep track of the value ourself. We create a new instance of the PollingCounter and foresee a callback method that will be used to read the counted value.
    • Notice that we are using Interlocked.Read() to guarantee thread-safety.
  • As we want to track the value ourself, we also need to provide a method to update the count.
    • Again, we are using an Interlocked.Add() to guarantee thread-safety.

This is what the end result looks like (I added some extra cleanup logic):

In the next post, we’ll have a look how we can consume the EventCounters data using some of the dotnet tools.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...