Skip to main content

Monitor your application using Event Counters–Part I

I’m building a data pipeline using TPL Dataflow to migrate data from a database to an external API. As this data pipeline could run for a long time, I was looking for a good way to monitor the progress. This turned out to be a perfect use case for Event Counters.

What are EventCounters?

Here is what the documentation has to say about Event Counters:

EventCounters are .NET APIs used for lightweight, cross-platform, and near real-time performance metric collection. EventCounters were added as a cross-platform alternative to the "performance counters" of .NET Framework on Windows. EventCounters can be used to track various metrics.

And somewhat further in the documentation:

Apart from the EventCounters that are provided by the .NET runtime, you may choose to implement your own EventCounters.

And that is exactly what we are going to do!

Implement our first EventCounter

There are 4 types of counters that you can use each with their own characteristics and use cases:

We’ll start with a simple use case; with our first EventCounter we want to track the number of records that are migrated. So this should be an ever increasing number while the migration pipeline is running.

  • I start by creating a class that inherits from EventSource:
  • Next, we need to annotate this class with the [EventSource] attribute and specify a unique name:
  • We foresee a static instance of our class and a variable that can be used to track the number of migrated records:
  • For this use case, I start by using the PollingCounter and keep track of the value ourself. We create a new instance of the PollingCounter and foresee a callback method that will be used to read the counted value.
    • Notice that we are using Interlocked.Read() to guarantee thread-safety.
  • As we want to track the value ourself, we also need to provide a method to update the count.
    • Again, we are using an Interlocked.Add() to guarantee thread-safety.

This is what the end result looks like (I added some extra cleanup logic):

In the next post, we’ll have a look how we can consume the EventCounters data using some of the dotnet tools.

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...