Skip to main content

Monitor your application using Event Counters - Part III

I'm building a data pipeline using TPL Dataflow to migrate data from a database to an external API. As this data pipeline could run for a long time, I was looking for a good way to monitor the progress. This turned out to be a perfect use case for Event Counters.

So far we have seen how to create a simple EventCounter using a PollingCounter and how to read out its value using the dotnet-counters global tool.

The PollingCounter uses a callback to determine the value that is reported. With each time interval, the user provided callback function is invoked and the return value is used as the counter value. This allows us to manage and track the number of migrated documents ourselves.

Let’s continue today and have a look at how we can use some of the other counters to improve our metrics.

Tracking the migration rate using the IncrementingPollingCounter

We are already tracking the number of migrated documents. Wouldn’t it be nice to also track the number of documents that are migrated in a certain interval, or better said the rate at which documents are migrated.

The good news is that we don’t have to do a lot to get this working. This is a perfect use case for the IncrementingPollingCounter.

From the documentation:

The IncrementingPollingCounter uses a callback to determine the reported increment value. With each time interval, the callback is invoked, and then the difference between the current invocation, and the last invocation is the reported value.

Let’s update our code to introduce this second metric.

  • We create a new variable of type IncrementingPollingCounter:
  • And instantiate this variable in our constructor.

Let’s run dotnet-counters again to see the results:

dotnet-counters monitor --process-id 32072--counters Migrator.MigratedRecordsCounter

Now we get 2 values back; our Migration Count total and the Migration Rate.

Remark: In the code above you saw that I also could specify a DisplayRateTimeScale.  I expected that this would allow me to set the interval at which the value should be read. However it turned out that this value is ignored and that the dotnet-counters will always use an interval of 1 second.

This is by design. More about this here.

 UPDATE: I made the full example available on Github: https://github.com/wullemsb/EventCounters

    Labels:

    Popular posts from this blog

    Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

    After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...
    Read more

    Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

    While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...
    Read more

    A complex system designed from scratch never works

    A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...
    Read more