Skip to main content

Units of measure in C#

Yesterday I talked about the 'units of measure' feature in F#. This allows you to associate a unit of measure to a type and allows the compiler to help you avoid providing the wrong input. Unfortunately in C#, a similar feature does not exist but we can let the type system help us by creating 'Value Objects'.

What are Value Objects?

Value objects are probably best known in the context of Domain Driven Design where they are one of the tactical patterns. They allow you to encapsulate (domain) logic in a type and should always be in  a valid state.

Eric Evans uses the following example to describe them:

When a child is drawing, he cares about the color of the marker he chooses, and he may care about the sharpness of the tip. But if there are two markers of the same color and shape, he probably won’t care which one he uses. If a marker is lost and replaced by another of the same color from a new pack, he can resume his work unconcerned about the switch.

Value Objects have some specific characteristics:

  • They have value equality, this means that 2 value objects are considered equal if all there values are the same. (see the example of the marker above)
  • They are always in a valid state. Behaviour should exist that validates the correctness of the value object at construction time.
  • They are immutable; this is important to help you guarantee the 2 other characteristics. Instead of changing an existing value object, a new one is created.

They can help you avoid ‘primitive obsession’.

More information:

Using Value Objects for a Unit of measure

Based on the information above, it should be obvious that Value Objects are a perfect candidate to describe units of measure inside your application. Here is a small example using record types:

Using Units.NET

Of course creating Value Objects for all possible units of measure can be a lot of work. The good news is that this work is already done for you. The Units.NET library has implemented more then 1200 units of measure.

Here is a small code snippet from their Github repo:

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...