Skip to main content

API Design in ASP.NET Core Part III

This week I had the honor to give a training to some of the newly started young professionals in our organisation. The topic of the training was API design in ASP.NET Core. During this training we discussed multiple topics and a lot of interesting questions were raised. I'll try to tackle some of them with a blog post.

The question I try to tackle today is...

What does the [APIController] attribute do?

If you created your first Web API in ASP.NET Core (through dotnet new webapi -o MyFirstAPI), you ended up with a WeatherForecastController containing the following code:

On top of this controller class, you see above the Route attribute, the ApiController attribute. Adding this attribute on top of your controller has a bigger impact than you would think and enables the following behaviours:

  • Attribute routing requirement
  • Automatic HTTP 400 responses
  • Binding source parameter inference
  • Multipart/form-data request inference
  • Problem details for error status codes

Attribute routing requirement

The moment you start using the ApiController attribute, attribute routing becomes a requirement. This means that actions in this controller are no longer accessible via routes defined through UseEndpoints() or UseMVC().

Automatic HTTP 400 responses

Adding the ApiController attribute will automatically check the model state and return HTTP 400 responses when your model state has validation errors. This makes the ModelState.IsValid check obsolete in your action methods:

Behind the scenes, a ModelStateInvalidFilter is registered, which runs during OnActionExecuting event and executes the code above.

Binding source parameter inference

Normally depending on where the data is coming from (URL, headers, request body, …) you need to explicitly annotate the parameters of your action method with a binding attribute like [FromBody] or [FromQuery].

After adding the ApiController attribute, binding source parameters are inferred using the following rules:

Binding Attribute Inference Rule
[FromBody] Inferred for any complex type
[FromForm] Inferred for any parameters of type IFormFile or IFormFileCollection
[FromQuery] Inferred for all the other action parameters
[FromRoute] Inferred for any action parameter whose name matches a parameter in the route template
[FromHeader] No inferred rule

Multipart/form-data request inference

The [ApiController] attribute applies an inference rule for action parameters of type IFormFile and IFormFileCollection. The multipart/form-data request content type is inferred for these types.

Problem details for error status codes

Furthermore, ApiController introduces the ValidationProblem format for HTTP 400 responses. It is a machine-readable RFC 7807 compliant format:

More information: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/web-api/?view=aspnetcore-6.0#apicontroller-attribute

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...