Skip to main content

API Design in ASP.NET Core Part IV

This week I had the honor to give a training to some of the newly started young professionals in our organisation. The topic of the training was API design in ASP.NET Core. During this training we discussed multiple topics and a lot of interesting questions were raised. I'll try to tackle some of them with a blog post.

The question I try to tackle today is...

What is idempotent in REST?

An important aspect when building REST API’s is the concept of ‘idempotency’. ‘Idem…what?’ I here you thinking.

Let’s ask MDN for an explanation:

An HTTP method is idempotent if an identical request can be made once or several times in a row with the same effect while leaving the server in the same state. In other words, an idempotent method should not have any side effects — unless those side effects are also idempotent. Implemented correctly, the GET, HEAD, PUT, and DELETE methods are idempotent, but not the POST method. All safe methods are also idempotent.

That explanation brings us to a second question, what are safe methods in REST?

MDN again:

An HTTP method is safe if it doesn't alter the state of the server. In other words, a method is safe if it leads to a read-only operation. Several common HTTP methods are safe: GET, HEAD, or OPTIONS. All safe methods are also idempotent, but not all idempotent methods are safe. For example, PUT and DELETE are both idempotent but unsafe.

Here is an overview:

HTTP method Safe? Idempotent?
GET yes yes
OPTIONS yes yes
HEAD yes yes
POST no no
DELETE no yes
PUT no yes
PATCH no no

Why is this important?

The answer is predictability. Developers that consume our API might expect that it follows the rules above. They might make certain technical decisions in their code assuming that the endpoints we provided them would work as per the standards. So knowing this will help us design our API endpoints that are compliant with industry standards, making lives easier for the people who use those APIs.

Another reason is reliability. You know when it is safe to implement some retry logic in your client without causing side effects. A library that can help you implement this is Polly.

 

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...