Skip to main content

TFS 2018–TFVC_RepositoryCodeIndexing Job Failing

Back from Holliday with a sequel for my last post. To quickly summarize our problem, we noticed very long wait times before jobs executed by the TFSJobAgent where executed. Things like triggering builds or releases, sending notifications and emails took hours before they got executed.

Will diving into the TFS administration pages, we identified the TFVC_RepositoryCodeIndexing jobs used for search as the root cause of the issue.

Let’s drill deeper into the problem by looking at a specific job log:

Events (46099) completed with status FailedAndRetry. Event 46099 completed with message 'Patch-PeriodicCatchUp: Code patch operation for Repository Id 96f8a036-54bc-47dc-9c37-08fc23d4a07b failed with error Error code -----> MaxAcceptableFractionOfFailedItemsInCrawlerThresholdBreached Exception message -----> Could not download content of lots of files, hence failing this Job. Failed Items Count: 38, Total Items: 38. Exception type -----> Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Common.CrawlerException Exception source -----> Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Crawler Stack trace, at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Crawler.Definitions.AbstractCrawler.ThrowIfFailedCrawlItemsBreachThreshold(Int32 failedRecordsCount, Int32 totalItemsToBeCrawled) at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Crawler.Extensions.Code.Tfvc.TfvcPatchHttpCrawler.TfvcCodeTraverser(TfvcPatchIndexCrawlSpec crawlSpec, TfvcHttpClientWrapper tfvcHttpWrapper, CrawlSinkParams crawlSinkParams) at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Crawler.Definitions.AbstractCrawler.Run(IndexingExecutionContext indexingExecutionContext) --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown --- at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw() at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Crawler.Definitions.AbstractCrawler.Run(IndexingExecutionContext indexingExecutionContext) at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Server.Jobs.Operations.SingleStageCPF.ExecutePipeline(PipelineContext pipelineContext, StringBuilder resultMessage, BookkeepOperation bookkeepOp) at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Server.Jobs.Operations.SingleStageCPF.Run(PipelineContext pipelineContext, StringBuilder resultMessage) --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown --- at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw() at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Server.Jobs.Operations.SingleStageCPF.Run(PipelineContext pipelineContext, StringBuilder resultMessage) at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Server.Jobs.Operations.Code.RepositoryCodeIndexingOperation.ExecuteCrawlerParserAndFeeder(PipelineContext pipelineContext, StringBuilder resultMessage) at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Server.Jobs.Operations.Code.RepositoryCodePatchOperation.RunOperation(IndexingExecutionContext indexingExecutionContext) [Crawler phase Total items crawled = 0. Time Taken = 15962320ms for Crawl spec type 'Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Crawler.CrawlSpecs.TfvcPatchIndexCrawlSpec', Crawler extension 'Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Crawler.Extensions.Code.Tfvc.TfvcPatchHttpCrawler'. ]'. OnPremiseTelemetryProperties :{"TFS.Search.Indexing.ParentCorrelationId":"5e7dfff9-485c-42ad-9101-8a258f530276","TFS.Search.Indexing.CorrelationId":"c911ee0a-2001-43fb-987d-96bb4bb8d826","TFS.Search.Indexing.CollectionName":"DefaultCollection","TFS.Search.Indexing.CollectionId":"ce06fba0-ec2f-466a-8569-1e9a13789614","TFS.Search.Indexing.ProjectName":"Ner","TFS.Search.Indexing.ProjectId":"96f8a036-54bc-47dc-9c37-08fc23d4a07b","TFS.Search.Indexing.ProjectIndexingUnitId":"144","TFS.Search.Indexing.RepositoryName":"$/Ner","TFS.Search.Indexing.RepositoryId":"96f8a036-54bc-47dc-9c37-08fc23d4a07b","TFS.Search.Indexing.RepositoryIndexingUnitId":"145","TFS.Search.Indexing.CrawlerServiceFailure":"1","TFS.Search.Indexing.CrawlerServiceFailureReason":"Microsoft.VisualStudio.Services.Search.Common.CrawlerException","TFS.Search.Indexing.CrawlingTime":"15962320","TFS.Search.Indexing.OperationStatus":"Failed","TFS.Search.Indexing.EntityType":"Code","TFS.Search.Indexing.IndexingUnitType":"TFVC_Repository","TFS.Search.Indexing.ChangeType":"Patch","TFS.Search.Indexing.JobExecutionTime":"15962332"}

We were able to see the specific items that failed to index by executing the following query on the collection databases:

select [IndexingUnitId] from [<collection_db>].[Search].[tbl_IndexingUnit] where TFSEntityId like ‘96f8a036-54bc-47dc-9c37-08fc23d4a07b’

select * from [<collection_db>].[Search].[tbl_ItemLevelFailures] where IndexingUnitId = <IndexingUnitId fetched above>

Unfortunately this didn’t bring us any closer to a solution.

In the end we choose the most drastic approach, removed the Search extensions from all collections and removed ElasticSearch itself(https://bartwullems.blogspot.com/2017/11/tfs-2018-remove-elasticsearch.html).

After everything was removed, we reinstalled ElasticSearch, added the Search extensions again and this time everything seemed to work…

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...