Skip to main content

WPF 4.5: Airspace problem solved(...or not)

The airspace problem was one of the most annoying issues when integration a Win 32 component(like WinForms) with WPF. The problem is that each render technology belongs to only one airspace only. So when you place Win32 components in your WPF application they behave as a black hole for input leading to all kind of issues.
I blogged about this issue before and even showed a possible workaround.
With WPF 4.5 the issue is finally solved!
To do this 2 extra properties are added to the HwndHost class(the base class for WindowsFormsHost): IsRedirected and CompositionMode.
  • IsRedirected: Set this property to true to solve the airspace problem. (It’s not enabled by default.)
  • CompositionMode: Specified how deep the integration should go. It has multiple possible values:
    • None: this is the default behavior and no integration is done: the airspace problems are still here.
    • OutputOnly: The airspace problem are solved but the user (and the input system) can’t interact with the hosted win32 component.
    • Full: the airspace problems are solved and interaction with the win32 component is possible.
Remark: These two properties have to be set before any rendering is done otherwise an exception will be thrown.

Remark 2: Someone mentioned in the comments that this feature is removed in the final version of .NET 4.5. I double checked it and indeed I couldn't find it :-(

On the MSDN forums I found the following info from the .NET 4.5 Beta Readme - http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=237569

1.3.10 Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF)

1.3.10.1 HwndHost feature has been removed from WPF in the .NET Framework 4.5 Beta
The .NET Framework 4.5 Developer Preview included a WPF HwndHost redirection feature. However, this feature had several known issues and has been removed from the .NET Framework 4.5 Beta. It will not be included in any future releases.
To resolve this issue:
No workaround is available.

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Kubernetes–Limit your environmental impact

Reducing the carbon footprint and CO2 emission of our (cloud) workloads, is a responsibility of all of us. If you are running a Kubernetes cluster, have a look at Kube-Green . kube-green is a simple Kubernetes operator that automatically shuts down (some of) your pods when you don't need them. A single pod produces about 11 Kg CO2eq per year( here the calculation). Reason enough to give it a try! Installing kube-green in your cluster The easiest way to install the operator in your cluster is through kubectl. We first need to install a cert-manager: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/releases/download/v1.14.5/cert-manager.yaml Remark: Wait a minute before you continue as it can take some time before the cert-manager is up & running inside your cluster. Now we can install the kube-green operator: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/kube-green/kube-green/releases/latest/download/kube-green.yaml Now in the namespace where we want t...

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...