Skip to main content

An update on runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests.

I talked about disabling the runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests setting in your web.config before. It seems that the story is a little bit more complex then I thought. Rick Strahl’s wrote a great article about some of the caveats of with the runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests in IIS 7/8.
He mentions that setting the runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests=”false”  has a different behavior as I originally expected. I expected that non-ASP.NET requests no longer passes through the ASP.NET Module pipeline. But that's not what actually happens.
Rick gave the following sample:
If you create a module like this:
<add name="SharewareModule" type="HowAspNetWorks.SharewareMessageModule"  />
by default it will fire against ALL requests regardless of the runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests flag. Even if the value runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="false", the module is fired with unmanaged requests going through it.

So what is the runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests really good for? It's essentially an override for managedHandler preCondition. If you declare your handler in web.config like this:
<add name="SharewareModule" type="HowAspNetWorks.SharewareMessageModule" 
           preCondition="managedHandler" />
and then set runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="false" your module only fires against managed requests. If you switch the flag to true, now your module ends up handling all IIS requests that are passed through from IIS.
 
So what do we need to remember?

You should always set the preCondition="managedHandler" attribute to ensure that only managed requests are fired on this module. But even if you do this, realize that runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true" can override this setting, so your module has to anticipate handling any kind of request.


Thanks Rick for this useful information!

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...