Skip to main content

YARP and Aspire: "https+http scheme is not supported"

Recently I was wiring up a YARP reverse proxy in front of a couple of Aspire-managed services: an API and an Angular frontend. Aspire gives you service discovery for free, so the obvious move is to point your YARP clusters at the logical service names instead of hardcoded URLs.

My first attempt looked like this:

"Clusters": {
  "api-cluster": {
    "Destinations": {
      "api-destination": {
        "Address": "https+http://api"
      }
    }
  },
  "frontend-cluster": {
    "Destinations": {
      "frontend-destination": {
        "Address": "https+http://angular-frontend"
      }
    }
  }
}

The https+http:// scheme is the standard Aspire service discovery convention: try HTTPS first, fall back to HTTP. It works fine when you're resolving endpoints through HttpClient.

Unfortunately YARP doesn’t like this configuration. After setting it up with these values I got the following error back:

The https+http scheme is not supported

YARP's own configuration binder doesn't understand the + scheme syntax on its own. It expects a destination address it can use directly. Service discovery resolution is a separate concern, and YARP needs to be told explicitly to run destinations through it.

Remark: If you are looking for an end-2-end example on how to setup YARP with Aspire, check out this blog post by Tim Deschryver: Using YARP as BFF within .NET Aspire: Integrating YARP into .NET Aspire.

The fix

Add the Microsoft.Extensions.ServiceDiscovery.Yarp package:

dotnet add package Microsoft.Extensions.ServiceDiscovery.Yarp

Then wire up service discovery and hook it into YARP's destination resolution in Program.cs:

builder.Services.AddServiceDiscovery();

builder.Services.AddReverseProxy()
    .LoadFromConfig(builder.Configuration.GetSection("ReverseProxy"))
    .AddServiceDiscoveryDestinationResolver();

AddServiceDiscoveryDestinationResolver() is the piece that makes YARP understand https+http:// addresses. It plugs service discovery into YARP's destination resolution pipeline, so the same appsettings.json cluster config you started with just works:

"Clusters": {
  "api-cluster": {
    "Destinations": {
      "api-destination": {
        "Address": "https+http://api"
      }
    }
  },
  "frontend-cluster": {
    "Destinations": {
      "frontend-destination": {
        "Address": "https+http://angular-frontend"
      }
    }
  }
}

No config changes needed once the resolver is registered. The Address values were correct from the start, YARP just needed to be told how to interpret them.

Remark: if you're using YARP's direct forwarding (IHttpForwarder) instead of the full proxy pipeline, the equivalent call is AddHttpForwarderWithServiceDiscovery() on the service collection, not the resolver extension above.

That's it. One package, one extension method, and the scheme error disappears.

More information

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...