Skip to main content

Our P95 spiked, now what?

Yesterday one of our Application Insights dashboard showed a P95 latency spike and we had no idea why. The telemetry told us that a request was slow. But it didn't tell us why. Was it a database call? A CPU-bound loop? Lock contention? A GC pause?

The naive approach would have to been to add logging statements around the code you suspect, redeploy, wait for the issue to reproduce, and repeat. In production, that's slow and it doesn't scale - you're guessing, and every guess costs a deployment cycle.

We stayed away from all that guess work and reached out to the Application Insights Profiler. Instead of reasoning from logs, you get actual flame graphs of real production requests, showing exactly where time was spent.

What the profiler actually captures

The profiler runs as an agent alongside your application and periodically captures traces of live requests - not synthetic load, actual production traffic. For each captured request, it builds a trace you can inspect down to the method level, showing where time went across the call stack.

If your app runs on Azure App Service, the good news is the profiler is preinstalled as part of the App Service runtime. You don't need to add anything to get it running. You enable it, and it starts capturing.

Remark: As I’ll show in the next post, you can easily enable it also in a containerized environment (like ACA or AKS) or even on-prem if you want.

Where to find it

Once it's enabled (I'll cover the actual setup in part 2), the Profiler lives under your Application Insights resource:

  • Select Performance in the left menu
  • Pick an operation from the operation name list - Overall is selected by default
  • Select Profiler traces
  • Pick one of the captured requests from the list

From there you land on the trace itself, where you can drill into the flame graph for that specific request.

Triggering a profile on demand

Waiting for the profiler to capture something interesting isn't always practical, especially if you're actively debugging an incident. There's a Profile now option that starts an on-demand session: every profiler agent sending data to your Application Insights instance starts capturing immediately, and the session shows up in the list after 5 to 10 minutes.

Remark: to trigger a session manually, you need at least write access on your role for the Application Insights component. In most setups you'll have this automatically - if you don't, it's worth checking your access before you assume the feature is broken.

So the question becomes:

How do you actually turn this on for your app, and what does reading one of these traces look like in practice?

That's what the rest of this series covers - part 2 walks through enabling the Profiler on App Service and in code, and part 3 gets into reading a flame graph without guessing.

Stay tuned!

More information

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...