Skip to main content

Avoiding truncation errors in Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse: Understanding UTF‑8, collations, and column lengths

Loading data into a Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse can feel effortless—until it suddenly isn’t. Being a total MS Fabric noob, the following error message caused some confusing and brough me on a learning journey I like to share:

String or binary data would be truncated while reading column of type 'VARCHAR(255)'.

Turns out that if you’re working with Parquet files, multilingual data, or Copy Into pipelines, this error can appear even when the source column seems to match the target column. In this post, I’ll walk through why this happens, why collation changes alone don’t fix it, and what you can do to avoid it.

The scenario

I was loading data from an on premise datasource through a data gateway into a Fabric Data Warehouse table. The target column is defined as:

NAME_LB VARCHAR(255)

To already give you a hint, the source column contains values like:

The column lengths match. I even switched the collation to a UTF‑8 compatible one:

COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AS_KS_WS_SC_UTF8

And yet… the load still fails with a truncation error. Why?

The root cause: Bytes vs. Characters

Fabric Warehouses store text in UTF‑8 when using UTF‑8 collations. That means:

  • VARCHAR(255) = 255 bytes, not 255 characters

  • ASCII characters → 1 byte

  • Extended characters (Ö, é, ç, …) → 2–4 bytes

So a string that is 200 characters long may exceed 255 bytes if it contains multi‑byte characters.

This is the key insight:

Truncation errors in Fabric are about byte length, not character length.

Changing the collation to a UTF‑8 one ensures that characters like Ö are stored correctly, but it does not change the byte limit of the column.

Even with UTF‑8 collation:

VARCHAR(255)

still means:

  • Maximum 255 bytes

  • Not 255 characters

  • Not “255 Unicode characters”

So if the source contains a value that exceeds 255 bytes, the load fails.

How to inspect the column metadata?

If you encounter this problem, a good starting point is to inspect the column metadata. This can be done with the following SQL query:

SELECT COLUMN_NAME, DATA_TYPE, CHARACTER_MAXIMUM_LENGTH, COLLATION_NAME FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = 'SCHEMA-ABCD' AND TABLE_NAME = 'TABLE-ABCD';

The fix

We fixed it by increasing the column size for the impacted columns. As you cannot ALTER a column in a Fabric datawarehouse directly, we achieved it by deleting and re-adding the column:

ALTER TABLE SCHEMA.TABLE_X DROP COLUMN NAME_LB;
ALTER TABLE SCHEMA.TABLE_X ADD NAME_LB VARCHAR(300) COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AS_KS_WS_SC_UTF8

That’s it!

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...