Skip to main content

Avoiding truncation errors in Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse: Understanding UTF‑8, collations, and column lengths

Loading data into a Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse can feel effortless—until it suddenly isn’t. Being a total MS Fabric noob, the following error message caused some confusing and brough me on a learning journey I like to share:

String or binary data would be truncated while reading column of type 'VARCHAR(255)'.

Turns out that if you’re working with Parquet files, multilingual data, or Copy Into pipelines, this error can appear even when the source column seems to match the target column. In this post, I’ll walk through why this happens, why collation changes alone don’t fix it, and what you can do to avoid it.

The scenario

I was loading data from an on premise datasource through a data gateway into a Fabric Data Warehouse table. The target column is defined as:

NAME_LB VARCHAR(255)

To already give you a hint, the source column contains values like:

The column lengths match. I even switched the collation to a UTF‑8 compatible one:

COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AS_KS_WS_SC_UTF8

And yet… the load still fails with a truncation error. Why?

The root cause: Bytes vs. Characters

Fabric Warehouses store text in UTF‑8 when using UTF‑8 collations. That means:

  • VARCHAR(255) = 255 bytes, not 255 characters

  • ASCII characters → 1 byte

  • Extended characters (Ö, é, ç, …) → 2–4 bytes

So a string that is 200 characters long may exceed 255 bytes if it contains multi‑byte characters.

This is the key insight:

Truncation errors in Fabric are about byte length, not character length.

Changing the collation to a UTF‑8 one ensures that characters like Ö are stored correctly, but it does not change the byte limit of the column.

Even with UTF‑8 collation:

VARCHAR(255)

still means:

  • Maximum 255 bytes

  • Not 255 characters

  • Not “255 Unicode characters”

So if the source contains a value that exceeds 255 bytes, the load fails.

How to inspect the column metadata?

If you encounter this problem, a good starting point is to inspect the column metadata. This can be done with the following SQL query:

SELECT COLUMN_NAME, DATA_TYPE, CHARACTER_MAXIMUM_LENGTH, COLLATION_NAME FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = 'SCHEMA-ABCD' AND TABLE_NAME = 'TABLE-ABCD';

The fix

We fixed it by increasing the column size for the impacted columns. As you cannot ALTER a column in a Fabric datawarehouse directly, we achieved it by deleting and re-adding the column:

ALTER TABLE SCHEMA.TABLE_X DROP COLUMN NAME_LB;
ALTER TABLE SCHEMA.TABLE_X ADD NAME_LB VARCHAR(300) COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AS_KS_WS_SC_UTF8

That’s it!

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...