Skip to main content

Solving the "Synchronous operations are disallowed" Exception in ASP.NET Core

After making a small change to an ASP.NET core application, I got the following runtime error:

System.InvalidOperationException: 'Synchronous operations are disallowed. Call ReadAsync or set AllowSynchronousIO to true instead.'

Here is the code that caused the error:

Let's explore why this happens, when it occurs, and most importantly, how to fix it properly.

Why does this exception occur?

Starting with ASP.NET Core 3.0, Microsoft made a significant architectural change: synchronous I/O operations are disabled by default on the server. This decision was made to improve application performance and prevent thread pool starvation.

In traditional synchronous I/O operations, threads are blocked while waiting for data to be read or written. In a web server handling hundreds or thousands of concurrent requests, this can quickly exhaust the thread pool, leading to:

  • Poor scalability
  • Increased response times
  • Potential deadlocks
  • Resource exhaustion

Asynchronous I/O operations release threads back to the thread pool while waiting for I/O operations to complete, allowing the server to handle more concurrent requests with fewer resources avoiding all the issues above.

Solutions: The right way vs. The quick fix

The right way to fix this is by switching to an async version of our code:

If an async alternative is not available and you really want to use synchronous operations, you can enable this globally or at the request level:

More information

Breaking changes in .NET Core 3.0 - .NET | Microsoft Learn

Configure options for the ASP.NET Core Kestrel web server | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...