Skip to main content

Understanding SERVICE_SID_TYPE_UNRESTRICTED in Azure DevOps Agent Configuration

When configuring self-hosted Azure DevOps agents on Windows, one often-overlooked setting can significantly improve security and resource access control: the SERVICE_SID_TYPE_UNRESTRICTED.

I first learned about this when configuring a new build agent on our build server. While going through the configuration steps, I got an extra question if I wanted to enable the SERVICE_SID_TYPE_UNRESTRICTED for the agent service. As I had no clue what this option means, I decided to dive in and write a blog post about it.

What is SERVICE_SID_TYPE_UNRESTRICTED?

Windows services can be assigned a Service SID (Security Identifier) to help manage access to resources. By default, Azure DevOps agents run with SERVICE_SID_TYPE_NONE, which means no service-specific SID is added to the process token.

Setting the SID type to UNRESTRICTED adds a unique SID like NT SERVICE\vstsagent.{tenant}.{pool}.{agent} to the agent's process token. This allows you to:

  • Grant access to local resources (e.g., folders, certificates) specifically to that agent.

  • Isolate permissions between multiple agents on the same machine.

  • Avoid managing separate user accounts or passwords for each agent.

How to enable it

During the interactive configuration of the agent (via config.cmd), you can specify this SID type:

.\config.cmd --unattended --enableservicesidtypeunrestricted

Or, if you're using the interactive prompt, it may ask whether to set the SID type to UNRESTRICTED (as you can see in the screenshot above).

Why this matters

Here’s why this setting is especially useful:

  • Security: You can restrict access to sensitive resources (like secrets or build artifacts) to only the specific agent service.

  • Scalability: Multiple agents can run under the same account but still be isolated via their unique SIDs.

  • Maintainability: Reduces the need for managing separate service accounts or passwords.

More information

Deploy an Azure Pipelines agent on Windows - Azure Pipelines | Microsoft Learn

Agent runnig on Windows as a service should set service SID type to SERVICE_SID_TYPE_UNRESTRICTED · Issue #2814 · microsoft/azure-pipelines-agent

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...