Skip to main content

How to hide ‘Server’ and ‘X-Powered-By’ headers in ASP.NET Core

As we see security as a top priority, for every new application that we put in production, we let it be penetration tested first. One remark we got with the last pen test was about the information our servers inadvertently revealed through HTTP response headers. Although I think it is not the biggest possible security issue, exposing details about their technology stack through headers like Server and X-Powered-By, gives some reconnaissance information to potential attackers for free.

n this post, we'll explore why you should hide these headers and demonstrate several methods to remove or customize them in ASP.NET Core applications.

Generated with Bing Image Creator

Why hide server headers?

Server identification headers might seem harmless, but they can pose security risks:

Information Disclosure: Headers like Server: Kestrel or X-Powered-By: ASP.NET immediately tell attackers what technology stack you're using, making it easier for them to target known vulnerabilities.

Reconnaissance: Attackers often perform reconnaissance by scanning for specific server signatures to identify potential targets running vulnerable versions of software.

Security through obscurity: While not a primary security measure, hiding server information adds an extra layer of obscurity that can deter automated attacks and script kiddies.

Removing these headers in ASP.NET Core

Turns out that it not so simple to remove these headers from your ASP.NET Core application. Our first naive attempt was through a custom middleware:

However it turned out that this didn’t work and both headers were still there.

Some further research brought us to 2 solutions that work as expected. Depending on the hosting platform(Kestrel vs IIS) choose one or the other:

Remove 'Server' header when using Kestrel

You can configure Kestrel to not add the Server header at all by modifying the server options:

Remove 'Server' header and 'X-Powered-By' header when using IIS

When hosting on IIS, you'll need to configure the web.config file to remove IIS-specific headers:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...