Skip to main content

Monitor your A/B test in .NET

I’ m currently working on a new feature in one of our microservices. As this new feature could have large performance impact, we did some performance benchmarks up front through BenchMarkDotNet. The results looked promising but we were not 100% confident that these results are representative for real life usage. Therefore we decided to implement A/B testing.

Yesterday I showed how to implement A/B testing in .NET using .NET Feature Management. Today I want to continue on the same topic and show you how we added telemetry.

Measuring and analyzing results

The most critical aspect of A/B testing is measuring results. You need to track relevant metrics for each variation to determine which performs better. The most simple way to do this is to fall back to the built-in logging in .NET Core :

Although this is a good starting point, we can simplify and improve this by taking advantage of the built-in telemetry through OpenTelemetry and/or Application Insights.

Using OpenTelemetry

As I want to compare the request performance, it is sufficient to add an extra tag to the existing activity. This can easily be done through Activity.Current.SetTag():

Inside our Aspire Dashboard this extra tag is visible at the span level:

Using Application Insights

In theory, when using Application Insights, you should not change anything as Application Insights should be able to pick up the information from the Activity context. However I noticed that nothing was added to the traced requests.

I solved it by directly calling the active telemetry instance and adding the tag there:

Now the extra tag appeared as a custom dimension:



More information

.NET feature flag management - Azure App Configuration | Microsoft Learn

.NET Observability with OpenTelemetry - .NET | Microsoft Learn

Application Insights for ASP.NET Core applications - Azure Monitor | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...