Skip to main content

Avoiding unexpected costs from GitHub Copilot premium requests

Starting from last week June 18, 2025 an important change was activated in GitHub Copilot. From that day on you need to pay extra for any premium requests that exceed your monthly allowance. This means that we should start considering more how we use Copilot and be aware of the (potential) costs.

What are premium requests?

Premium requests are requests that use more advanced processing power and apply to any request that is not using the default models (GPT-4o and GPT-4.1 at the moment of writing this post).

The number of premium requests you get out-of-the-box is different depending on the plan you are using:

Important! Be also aware that a multiplier is applied to the cost depending on the model used. For some models (e.g. GPT-4.5) this can add up quickly as the multiplier can be as high as 50!

 

Disabling premium requests

If you want to avoid unexpected costs, you can disable premium requests so that they don’t exceed your monthly allowance of premium requests.

  • Go to the settings for your GitHub organization:

https://github.com/organizations/<yourorgname>/settings/

  • Click on Copilot – > Policies:

 

  • In the billing section at the top, set Additional Copilot premium requests to Disabled:

 

More information

Understanding and managing requests in Copilot - GitHub Docs

Plans for GitHub Copilot - GitHub Docs

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...