Skip to main content

Detecting breaking changes in your OpenAPI metadata

For the last 2 days I have been struggling with a breaking change I had in my ASP.NET Core web api that caused the consuming application to fail. I had a header parameter that was optional but became required after changing the nullability of my project to enabled.

Although I found the issue and was able to fix it quite fast, I was not happy with my current process and was wondering how I could prevent this from happening again.

This brought me to a final solution where I introduced some extra tests that compared the OpenAPI metadata between different implementations. Let me show you how I did it…

Generate OpenAPI documents at build time

To compare 2 OpenAPI metadata documents we first need to get them. For the already released version of the API, I can download the document through the OpenAPI endpoint (/openapi/v1.json by default). But what about the new version of the API that is still in development?

I solve this by generating the OpenAPI document at build time. This makes it easy to use and compare the OpenAPI documents without the need of hosting our OpenAPI.

Enabling build time generation is easy. We only need to add the following NuGet package to our project:

dotnet add package Microsoft.Extensions.ApiDescription.Server

Now if we build our application, it will:

  • Automatically generate the Open API document(s) associated with the app during build.
  • Populate the Open API documents in the app's output directory as {ProjectName}.json.

You can further customize this if you want. For more info on how to do this, have a look at the documentation:

Compare OpenAPI documents

Now that we have 2 OpenAPI documents available, we can compare them. Therefore I use the Open API Comparator. This tool is available both as a command line tool and as a nuget package.

To install it run the following command:

dotnet add package Criteo.OpenApi.Comparator

We can now integrate this in a unit test as you can see below:

If API changes are found, you can see the details on what has changed:

More information

Generate OpenAPI documents | Microsoft Learn

criteo/openapi-comparator

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...