Skip to main content

.NET 9–OpenAPI and Scalar–Introduction

With the release of .NET 9, Microsoft has removed Swashbuckle from the default Web API templates. If you have never heard about Swashbuckle before, it allowed you to generate OpenAPI metadata for your web api's. Although I had no complaints using the Swagger UI, I decided to use the opportunity to have a look at library, Scalar, to generate an UI based on the OpenAPI documentation.

In this post, I’ll walk you through my transition from Swashbuckle to Scalar, highlighting the benefits, challenges, and key implementation steps.

Why the change?

Microsoft decided to drop Swashbuckle due to maintenance issues and a shift toward integrated OpenAPI support. While Swashbuckle provided automatic documentation, Swagger UI integration, and customizability, Scalar introduces a sleek UI, mobile-friendly interface, and enhanced search capabilities. Scalar not only provides great integration for .NET but also works on a lot of other platforms.

Setting Up Scalar in .NET 9

To integrate Scalar into your .NET 9 Web API, follow these steps:

  • Start by installing the required packages

dotnet add package Scalar.AspNetCore

dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi

  • Next step is to configure the OpenAPI integration in our Program.cs file.
  • The configuration above will generate a default v1.json OpenAPI metadata file that is accessible at /openapi/v1.json.

  • The last step is to access the API documentation through Scalar. You can access the Scalar UI by browsing to /scalar/v1, which provides an interactive API documentation experience.
    • Remark: the v1 part should match with the name of the OpenApi document that is used in the OpenApi configuration.

In a next post I look at how we can further tweak the experience when using the built-in OpenAPI support and Scalar. Stay tuned!

More information

Scalar - Document, Test & Discover APIs

Announcement: Swashbuckle.AspNetCore is being removed in .NET 9 · Issue #54599 · dotnet/aspnetcore

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...