Skip to main content

Azure DevOps– Obsolete check-in policies

Today I had to make a fix in an old project that was still using Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC). It immediately made me appreciate GIT a lot more but that is not what I want to talk about today.

After making my changes I had to check-in my changes (remark: commit my changes if you want to use the GIT terminology). One of the features that TFVC had to offer was the concept of check-in policies, rules that could be checked and validated before you can check-in your changes in the central source repository.

This was a feature we used a lot to improve the quality of the code and capture some mistakes as soon as possible. This time when I tried to check-in my changes, I noticed the following warning in Visual Studio:

Obsolete policies are being applied and should be updated.

This is because the way that TFVC check-in policies are stored in Azure DevOps has changed. This migration is required for keeping TFVC check-in compatible with the future Azure DevOps versions. The good news is that for every old policy, a new policy is created that guarantees future compatibility. For the time being, both old (Obsolete) and new policies remain valid and functional.

Let me show you how to update your policies:

  • In Visual Studio, open the Azure DevOps overview screen. Click on Settings.

  • On the Settings screen, click on Source Control under the Team Project settings.

 

  • On the Source Control Settings screen, go to the Check-in Policy tab and click on Remove for each of the obsolete policies.

 

  • Afterwards click on Add… and choose the non-obsolete alternative of the check-in policies that you just removed.

 

  • That’s it!

More information

Azure DevOps service updates and integration improvements | Microsoft Learn

TFVC Policies Storage Updates - Azure DevOps Blog

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...
Read more

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...
Read more

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...
Read more