Skip to main content

ASP.NET Core - Use factory based middleware with scoped services

Yesterday I talked about a problem we encountered when trying to inject a scoped service into ASP.NET Core middleware.

The middleware used was convention based middleware, one of the ways to construct middleware in ASP.NET Core.

With convention based middleware there isn’t a base class or interface to implement. The only rules your middleware class needs to apply to are:

  • It has a public constructor with a parameter of type RequestDelegate.
  • It contains a public method named Invoke or InvokeAsync. This method must:
    • Return a Task.
    • Accept a first parameter of type HttpContext.

Convention based middleware is registered with a singleton lifetime, so you can only constructor injection for the dependencies with a singleton lifetime. For transient and scoped dependencies you need to add extra parameters to the InvokeAsync() method:

There is a log of magic going on when using convention based middleware and it shouldn’t be a surprise that people are not aware of its behavior.

If you want full control on the middleware construction and avoid any kind of convention-based “magic” you can use the factory based middleware instead.

Now we need a class that implements the IMiddleware interface:

A transient or scoped dependency can now be injected through the constructor:

The only thing remaining to do is to register our factory based middleware with a transient lifetime:

More information

ASP.NET Core–Factory based vs Convention based middleware

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...