Skip to main content

Type pattern matching in C# and TypeScript

Although C# remains an object-oriented programming language, it has incorporated more and more functional techniques over the years. One of this techniques is ‘pattern matching’.

 


On the Microsoft Learn website, it is explained like this:

Pattern matching is a technique where you test an expression to determine if it has certain characteristics.

Not so sexy right? In fact it is rather boring described like this. That is because pattern matching is not something fancy new. It is here to simplify complex if-else statements into more compact and readable code. Pattern matching does not aim at writing code that cannot be written without. Its only purpose is to have more concise and elegant code.

There are multiple supported pattern types; constant patterns, declaration patterns, relational patterns, and so on…

In this post I want to talk about a specific pattern; the type pattern.

The type pattern in itself is quite simple, it checks the runtime type of an expression.  Here is a simple example in C#:

A typical use case where I apply this is inside a CQRS or Actor model based system where a CommandHandler or Actor could handle multiple message types:

TypeScript also supports pattern matching, but you have to use a workaround when you want to use a type pattern. You cannot check the type itself but what you can do is add a type property on your object and combine this with a discriminated union:

This type object can then be used inside your switch statement. The Typescript compiler will give you intellisense and detects the different types and their properties:

More information

https://blog.ndepend.com/c-pattern-matching-explained/ 

https://endjin.com/blog/2022/02/pattern-matching-in-csharp

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...