Skip to main content

Giving the .NET smart components a try–The Smart TextArea

Microsoft announced last month, the .NET Smart Components, an experimental set of AI-powered UI components that can be added to your .NET apps. They asked us to give these components a try and share our feedback.

In a first post I tried the Smart Combobox. Now let’s have a look at the Smart TextArea component.

The idea of the Smart TextArea is that it gives you a smart autocomplete that can be tailored to the specific context you want to use it in. It looks at what the user is currently typing and tries to make suggestions based on the configured context and tone.

It feels quite similar to prompt engineering but with a focus on helping you typing a text faster and easier. 

Here is an example use case from the documentation:

Your app might allow agents to respond to customer/staff/user messages by typing free text, e.g., in a live chat system, support ticket system, CRM, bug tracker, etc. You can use Smart TextArea to help those agents be more productive, writing better-phrased responses with fewer keystrokes.

Time to give it a try!

Integrate Smart TextArea in an ASP.NET Core MVC app

The first steps are the same as in the previous post, but I’ll repeat them here.

We start by creating a new ASP.NET Core MVC application.

Remark: The Smart Components are supported in both Blazor and MVC/RazorPages applications.

Add the SmartComponents.AspNetCore NuGet package to your project:

dotnet add package --prerelease SmartComponents.AspNetCore

Open your Program.cs file and add the following lines to register the necessary services:

Now open the _ViewImports.cshtml file (in the Views folder) and reference the Smart Component tag helpers:

Okay. Now we can finally add our Smart TextArea to our Razor view. To tweak the component to our context, we need to specify a user role that describes who is typing and for what reason, optionally giving other contextual information:

Next to a user role, we can specify an array user phrases that helps the language model reply using your preferred tone/voice, common phrases, and give any information you wish about policies, URLs, or anything else that may be relevant to incorporate into the suggested completions:

Integrate a self-hosted AI backend

We are not there yet. Before we can use our Smart TextArea we need to provide an AI backend that our component can use to talk to a Large Language Model.

In this example I’ll use Ollama to self host an AI backend and Llama2 as the LLM.

Remark: If you want to learn how to use Ollama, check out this post.

Update your appsettings.json file and add the following section:

Make sure that the DeploymentName matches the deployed model. I’m using Llama3 that just got available inside Ollama.

We also need to register an IInferenceBackend.  As Ollama exposes an OpenAI compatible API we can use a package already created by Microsoft. Therefore we first need to install the SmartComponents.Inference.OpenAI package through NuGet:

dotnet add package --prerelease SmartComponents.Inference.OpenAI

Now we can register it inside our Program.cs file:

Let’s give it a try…

Now we can give our component a try. We run our application and start typing:

 


You can see that suggestions are added after typing a first part of the sentence. Nice!

Remark: Be aware that the quality of the results can vary drastically depending on the used language model.

More information

smartcomponents/docs/smart-textarea.md at main · dotnet-smartcomponents/smartcomponents (github.com)

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...