Skip to main content

Using Problem Details in .NET 7

When comparing API's, I see a lot of different ways how error messages are returned. With the introduction of Problem Details for HTTP APIs (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7807) , we finally have a standardized error payload to return when an unhandled exception occurs.

Although the standard was introduced before .NET 7, there was no out-of-the-box way to introduce the ProblemDetails spec into your ASP.NET Core application.

A solution was to use the third party Hellang.Middleware.ProblemDetails nuget package:

Starting from .NET 7 this nuget package is no longer necessary. You only need to add the following line to your service configuration:

If someone now calls your API and an exception occurs, the returned result will look like this:

We can further customize the behavior through CustomizeProblemDetails:

More information

Handle errors in ASP.NET Core web APIs | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...