Skip to main content

Applying the smart constructor pattern in C#

In Domain-Driven Design (DDD), domain invariants are fundamental principles or rules that must always hold true within a specific domain. These invariants define constraints or conditions that govern the behavior and state of the entities, value objects, and aggregates within the domain.

They emphasize the Always-valid rule:

Your domain model should always be in a valid state.

By using invariants, your domain model guarantees that it cannot represent illegal states. These invariants define the domain class: that class is what it is because of them. Therefore, you can’t possibly violate these invariants. If you do so, the domain class would simply cease being the thing you expect it to be; it’d become something else.

As Greg Young explains it:

A unicorn without a horn is a horse, not a unicorn.

There are multiple ways to protect those invariants. Using value objects and taking advantage of the type system are a great help here. However not all invariants can be enforced by the type system.

In that situation we can use Smart Constructors which is a function to create values only if they pass a certain criteria.

Let’s look at an example…

We have a small ProductItem value object (notice that I’m using C# record types here). As we don’t want to create the value object directly, we made the constructor private.

Now we add a static method that does the necessary validation before creating the value object:

Remark: The example above could probably be handled using a normal constructor but you get the point.

Learn more

Always-Valid Domain Model · Enterprise Craftsmanship

Smart constructors - HaskellWiki

reason-design-patterns/patterns/smart-constructors.md at master · leostera/reason-design-patterns (github.com)

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...