Skip to main content

Use cost as an architecture fitness function

As more and more applications are deployed to the cloud, cost becomes a first class architectural driver when designing and developing applications. In this post I want to explain how you can use cost as an architecture fitness function.

What are architecture fitness functions?

I first encountered fitness functions in the Building Evolutionary Architectures book by Rebecca Parsons, Neal Ford and Patrick Kua. They describe how close an architecture is to achieving an architectural aim. Fitness functions introduces  continuous feedback on the architecture level and inform the development process as it happens, rather than after the fact(for example when doing an architecture review).

They help to ensure that a system's architecture aligns with its intended goals, meets the desired quality attributes, and adheres to best practices.

Some examples of architecture fitness functions I used in the past are:

  • Latency Monitoring: Ensure that response times for critical services do not exceed a predefined threshold.
  • Dependency Analysis: Check that services do not have excessive dependencies or cyclic dependencies.
  • Security Scanning: Scan for known security vulnerabilities and ensure that access controls are correctly implemented.
  • Service Availability: Monitor service availability and uptime, ensuring that it meets agreed-upon service level agreements (SLAs).

By using architecture fitness functions, development teams can maintain a well-structured and high-quality architecture throughout the development and. evolution of a software system, ultimately leading to more reliable and efficient systems.

How to monitor cost?

Now that we now what a fitness function is, let us have a look at some ways to track cost as an architecture fitness function. Of course there are a lot of infrastructure cost estimation tools available. In this post I’ll show an example using Azure Cost Estimator(ACE) although I heard good things about Infracost as well. ACE supports Bicep/ARM and Terraform and can be run as an integral part of your CI/CD pipeline.

Of course to get good estimations, ACE needs to know the expected usage. This can be provided through usage patterns.

ACE will then use this pattern to generate usage based consumption for the Azure resources and provides better accuracy for the cost estimations.

You can run it by directly using the available executable or by using Docker.

Remark: In the example above we expect that the azure-cost-estimator.exe is available at the path environment variable.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.