Skip to main content

Phind–Your personal programming assistant

With the release of ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, Amazon Code Whisperer just to name a few, large language models are the (new?) cool kid in town and you see a lot of new applications pop up trying to claim a part of this space.

If you are still in doubt if these tools can help improve your developer productivity, check out this survey executed and published by GitHub.

92% of developers already saying they use AI coding tools at work and in their personal time, which makes it clear AI is here to stay. 70% of the developers we surveyed say they already see significant benefits when using AI coding tools, and 81% of the developers we surveyed expect AI coding tools to make their teams more collaborative—which is a net benefit for companies looking to improve both developer velocity and the developer experience.

The list of available tools is long and keeps growing every day. Here are some I’m aware of:

And of course let us not forget ChatGPT.

Today I want to add another one to the list; Phind. Phind uses a combination of GPT-4 and their own model. This model should hallucinate less and write better code.

I started by asking to create a small application using the Task Parallel Library(TPL) DataFlow in C#:

 

Here is the exact prompt I was using:

I want to create a new C# application using the Task Parallel Library. This application should read a CSV file and parse it using multiple datablocks. Can you give me an example on how to write this code?
The result is not bad although the created example doesn’t take advantage of the TPL as it first reads all the data into memory. Let’s see if we can fix this:

This gives the following result:

The Main method became async and we got rid of the Wait() statement as we wanted. This is much better and more in line with the asynchronous nature of the Task Parallel Library.

Love it! (Of course it is again a good example on how you as a developer still need to understand what is going on so you can hint the AI assistent to improve the code).

Remark: You can also use it directly inside VSCode using this plugin.

If you compare this with what I got back from ChatGPT, the example created by Phind is much more what I expected:

And just for completeness, this is what I got back when asking the same question at GitHub Copilot Chat:

Not so good either. Phind is a clear winner int this example…

Remark: I tried some related prompts to further improve the result I got back from ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot but I never got to the result I got from Phind.

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...