Skip to main content

Control the execution order of your attributes through [CallerLineNumber]

In HotChocolate, the GraphQL library I use most of the time, you have the concept of field middleware. It allows you to create reusable logic that will be executed before or after a field resolver.

A typical example of built-in field middleware is the support for pagination, filtering and sorting. When executing this middleware, there is a logical order in which you expect this middleware to be executed. For example, you expect that first the returned data will be filtered and then be paginated.

In a code-first approach this would look like this:

Remark: if you are wondering if this shouldn't be defined the other way around, have a look at this image that can also be found in the documentation:

You can do the same thing using an annotation-based approach:

When I first saw this code, I was wondering how this could uberhaupt work. I know that in .NET the attribute order should not be respected by the compiler. So although we specified [UsePaging] first and [UseFiltering] second, there is no guarantee that this will be the order in which this field middleware is executed.

So why don’t I see any remarks about this in the documentation?

[CallerLineNumber] magic

A look at the source code brought me the answer. If you look at the constructor of the attribute, you could see an order argument annotated with the [CallerLineNumber] attribute:

The [CallerLineNumber] attribute allows you to obtain the line number in the source file at which the method is called.

By using the line number as our order value, the order in which our attributes are added is respected when executing the field middleware.

Clever!

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...