Skip to main content

Control the execution order of your attributes through [CallerLineNumber]

In HotChocolate, the GraphQL library I use most of the time, you have the concept of field middleware. It allows you to create reusable logic that will be executed before or after a field resolver.

A typical example of built-in field middleware is the support for pagination, filtering and sorting. When executing this middleware, there is a logical order in which you expect this middleware to be executed. For example, you expect that first the returned data will be filtered and then be paginated.

In a code-first approach this would look like this:

Remark: if you are wondering if this shouldn't be defined the other way around, have a look at this image that can also be found in the documentation:

You can do the same thing using an annotation-based approach:

When I first saw this code, I was wondering how this could uberhaupt work. I know that in .NET the attribute order should not be respected by the compiler. So although we specified [UsePaging] first and [UseFiltering] second, there is no guarantee that this will be the order in which this field middleware is executed.

So why don’t I see any remarks about this in the documentation?

[CallerLineNumber] magic

A look at the source code brought me the answer. If you look at the constructor of the attribute, you could see an order argument annotated with the [CallerLineNumber] attribute:

The [CallerLineNumber] attribute allows you to obtain the line number in the source file at which the method is called.

By using the line number as our order value, the order in which our attributes are added is respected when executing the field middleware.

Clever!

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...