Skip to main content

Can you keep a secret?

A lot of applications store sensitive security related data inside their configuration. Things like API keys, database connection information, even passwords are directly accesible inside the app.config or web.config of a .NET application. Last week a colleague mentioned that they uploaded a project to GitHub accidently exposing the root AWS password for their Amazon account. Whooops!

With ASP.NET Core, Microsoft tries to solve this kind of problems with the introduction of the SecretManager command-line tool. This tool allows you to store these sensitive values in a secure way without exposing them through source control.

If you want to enable it, add the following entry to the “tools” section of project.json:

"Microsoft.Extensions.SecretManager.Tools": {
  "version": "1.0.0-preview1-final",
  "imports": "portable-net45+win8+dnxcore50"
}

You also need a unique identifier that links your project to the secret manager. Therefore add a userSecretsId for your project in its project.json file:

image
Now we can use the Secret Manager tool from a command window to set a secret:
dotnet user-secrets set MySecretKey MySecretValue
image

You can then reference the secret values stored by the secret manager by adding a reference to the Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.UserSecrets package. Now we can add the “AddUserSecrets()” method to our Startup.cs file:

image

Probably you only want to do this during development, so wrap it inside an if block:

image

This will overwrite any configuration options loaded from a configuration file with the contents of the secret store. 

Remark: The secret store actually isn’t too secret, its just a set of JSON files hidden in your user profile folder.  It only prevents you from checking in these values into source control.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...