Skip to main content

ASP.NET MVC 4: Error when using anti-forgery token in combination with claims-based authentication

Enabling Claims Based authentication on your ASP.NET MVC project is easy:

  • Create a new ASP.NET MVC web application
  • Right click on the project and choose the Identity and Access… option(if you don’t see this option, make sure that you have the Identity and Access Tool extension installed)
  • Walk through the configuration wizard and… done!

But when I tried to do this on a new project, it failed with the following error:

“A claim of type 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/05/identity/claims/nameidentifier' or 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/accesscontrolservice/2010/07/claims/identityprovider' was not present on the provided ClaimsIdentity. To enable anti-forgery token support with claims-based authentication, please verify that the configured claims provider is providing both of these claims on the ClaimsIdentity instances it generates. If the configured claims provider instead uses a different claim type as a unique identifier, it can be configured by setting the static property AntiForgeryConfig.UniqueClaimTypeIdentifier.”

clip_image002

Woops! This approach has always worked for me. So something must have been changed. And indeed, I was using an ASP.NET MVC 4 project where before I was using ASP.NET MVC 3.

Using Html.AntiForgeryToken in MVC 4 has changed slightly from the previous version if you’re building a claims-aware application. In prior versions User.Identity.Name was included in the anti-forgery token as a way to validate the <form> being submitted, but in MVC 4 if the identity is IClaimsIdentity (WIF) or ClaimsIdentity (.NET 4.5) then the anti-forgery token attempts to put one or more claim values into the anti-forgery token.

The problem is which claim(s) should it use? The value needs to uniquely identifier the user, so by default MVC expects the nameidentifier and the identityprovider  If you’re using the Windows AzureACS as your STS then you’re all set. If you’re not using ACS then you’ll see the same error I had.

You can solve it by telling ASP.NET MVC which claim you want to use to uniquely identify the user. You do this by setting the AntiForgeryConfig.UniqueClaimTypeIdentifier property:

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...
Read more

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...
Read more

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.
Read more