Skip to main content

The Transient Fault Handling Application Block

While looking for some good error handling strategies for cloud solutions, I found the following Microsoft Patterns & Practices Application Block: The Transient Fault Handling Application Block.

From the site:

The Microsoft Enterprise Library Transient Fault Handling Application Block lets developers make their applications more resilient by adding robust transient fault handling logic. Transient faults are errors that occur because of some temporary condition such as network connectivity issues or service unavailability. Typically, if you retry the operation that resulted in a transient error a short time later, you find that the error has disappeared.

Different services can have different transient faults, and different applications require different fault handling strategies. The Transient Fault Handling Application Block encapsulates information about the transient faults that can occur when you use the following Windows Azure services in your application:

  • SQL Azure
  • Windows Azure Service Bus
  • Windows Azure Storage
  • Windows Azure Caching Service

The Transient Fault Handling Application Block enables the developer to select from the following retry strategies:

  • Incremental
  • Fixed interval
  • Exponential back-off

The Enterprise Library Transient Fault Handling Application Block includes the following features:

  • You can select from an extensible collection of error detection strategies for cloud-based services, and an extensible collection of retry strategies.
  • You can use the graphical Enterprise Library configuration tool to manage configuration settings.
  • You can extend the block by adding error detection strategies for other services or by adding custom retry strategies.

The Transient Fault Handling Application Block uses detection strategies to identify all known transient error conditions. You can use one of the built-in detection strategies for SQL Azure, Windows Azure Storage, Windows Azure Caching, or the Windows Azure Service Bus. You can also define detection strategies for any other services that your application uses.

Some possible retry strategies:

  • Fixed interval: Retry four times at one-second intervals
  • Incremental interval: Retry four times, waiting one second before the first retry, then two seconds before the second retry, then three seconds before the third retry, and four seconds before the fourth retry.
  • Exponential back off: Retry four times, waiting two seconds before the first retry, then four seconds before the second retry, then eight seconds before the third retry, and sixteen seconds before the fourth retry.

And here is a sample:

using Microsoft.Practices.TransientFaultHandling;
using Microsoft.Practices.TransientFaultHandling.RetryStrategies;
using Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.WindowsAzure.TransientFaultHandling.AzureStorage;

// Define your retry strategy: retry 3 times, 1 second apart.
var retryStrategy = new FixedInterval(3, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1));

// Define your retry policy using the retry strategy and the Windows Azure storage
// transient fault detection strategy.
var retryPolicy =
new RetryPolicy<StorageTransientErrorDetectionStrategy>(retryStrategy);

// Do some work that may result in a transient fault.
try
{
// Call a method that uses Windows Azure storage and which may
// throw a transient exception.
retryPolicy.ExecuteAction(
() =>
{
this.queue.CreateIfNotExist();
});
}
catch (Exception)
{
// All of the retries failed.
}

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...