Skip to main content

Custom web.config transforms

One of the nice features of Visual Studio 2012(and also Visual Studio 2010) is the ability to use Web.config transformations.
However the list of supported transforms is  somewhat limited. I was looking for a way to execute a transformation only if a specific element doesn’t exist yet in your root web.config file. I discovered that Web.config transform engine can be extended to support additional transformations.
On the AppHarbor blog, I found a sample transformation that exactly did what I needed: 
using System.Linq;
using System.Xml;
using Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Tasks;

namespace AppHarbor.TransformTester.Transforms
{
    public class Merge : Transform
    {
        public Merge() : base(TransformFlags.UseParentAsTargetNode)
        {}

        protected override void Apply()
        {
            Apply((XmlElement)TargetNode, (XmlElement)TransformNode);
        }

        public void Apply(XmlElement targetElement, XmlElement transformElement)
        {
            var targetChildElement = targetElement.ChildNodes.OfType<XmlElement>()
                .FirstOrDefault(x => x.LocalName == transformElement.LocalName);
            if (targetChildElement == null)
            {
                targetElement.AppendChild(transformElement);
                return;
            }

            foreach (var transformChildElement in transformElement.ChildNodes
                .OfType<XmlElement>())
            {
                Apply(targetChildElement, transformChildElement);
            }
        }
    }
}
If you want to use this transform you need to add it using the xdt:Import element. You can place that element inside the xml document anywhere immediately under the root element. This element will allow us to utilize our own transform class. It only has 3 possible attributes.

  • namespace – This is the namespace which the transform is contained in  
  • path – This is the full path to the assembly  
  • assembly – This is the assembly name which contains the transform
You can only use one of the two; path and assembly.

So the import will look like this  in your transformation XML:

   

<xdt:Import assembly="AppHarbor.TransformTester" namespace="AppHarbor.TransformTester.Transforms"/>

From that moment one you can start applying it:


<configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform">    
<connectionStrings xdt:Transform="Merge" />    
 <connectionStrings>        
  <add name="bar" connectionString="value" xdt:Transform="Insert"/>    
 </connectionStrings>
</configuration>


The only disadvantage I think is that you have to install this transform assembly on all developer pc’s if they want to execute these transformations locally.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...