Skip to main content

Design Patterns: Null Object

‘If you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail’. My favorite pattern today is the Null object pattern, so I’m applying it everywhere Glimlach
But what’s this pattern exactly and why is it so useful? Let’s consider the following code :
class DiscountRepository
{
    public Discount GetDiscountFor(Order order)
    {
    }
}

public abstract class Discount
{   
   public abstract int Calculate(Order order);
}

We have an abstract class that represents our object and a repository.

Now what if you have an order for which there is no discount information available in the database. You always have to check for null and having this all over the place make the code less readable.

public void ProcessOrder(Order order)
{
    var discount=_repository.GetDiscountFor(order);
    if (discount != null)
        discount.Calculate(order);
}

I don’t like this code.  So let’s apply the Null Object pattern to make the above code prettier and less error-prone. All we need to do is to implement the abstract class(you can achieve the same result by using an interface) one more time but this time we will do it inside our Discount class like this :

public abstract class Discount
{
    public abstract int Calculate(Order order);
        
    public static readonly Discount NULL = new NullDiscount();
    private class NullDiscount : Discount
    {            
        public override int Calculate(Order order) { return 0; }
    }
}

Our ProcessOrder now looks like this :

public void ProcessOrder(Order order)
{
    var discount=_repository.GetDiscountFor(order);
    discount.Calculate(order);
}

And our GetDiscountFor method looks like this :

public Discount GetDiscountFor(Order order)
{
    if(/* Not Found */)
        return Discount.NULL;
    else
        /* The db record */
}

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...