Skip to main content

Entity Framework 4.1 Problem

One of the great improvements of Entity Framework 4.1 is the introduction of conventions. Unfortunately due to some time constraints the EF team had to remove the support for customizable conventions. Still, there are some default conventions already available.

And it was one of these conventions that bit me in the foot last week. I created the following model:

public class PizzaIngredient
{
public int PizzaIngredientId { get; set; }
[Range(1,10)]
public int Price { get; set; }
[Required]
public string IngredientName { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
}

and the following context:

public class PizzaPlanetMVCContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<PizzaPlanet.MVC.Models.PizzaIngredient> PizzaIngredients { get; set; }
}

However when running the application, the following error message was returned:

Invalid object name 'dbo.PizzaIngredients’.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Invalid object name 'dbo.PizzaIngredients’.

The reason is that there is a default convention that defines the name of the table by pluralizing the name of the entity(PizzaIngredient –> PizzaIngredients). As I had created my database up front, my table was called PizzaIngredient which of course resulted in an invalid query.

How can you solve this?

The simplest way to solve this, is by removing this convention. Therefore open up the context class and add the following code block:

protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<PluralizingTableNameConvention>();
}

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...