Skip to main content

Tuning the default logging providers in ASP.NET Core through configuration

After deploying a new application to production, we noticed that a lot of extra log messages where written to the EventLog. As we didn't configure the EventLog logging provider in our application, we did not expect this. Turns out that when you create a new ASP.NET Core application with WebApplication.CreateBuilder, you get a set of logging providers activated out-of-the-box.

So the question becomes: which providers are enabled, and how do you get rid of the ones you don’t need?

Which providers are enabled by default?

The default builder registers the following providers:

  • Console
  • Debug
  • EventSource
  • EventLog (Windows only)

You can verify this yourself by looking at the registered ILoggerProvider services:

var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
var app = builder.Build();

var providers = app.Services.GetServices<ILoggerProvider>();
foreach (var provider in providers)
{
    Console.WriteLine(provider.GetType().Name);
}

On Windows this prints something like:

ConsoleLoggerProvider
DebugLoggerProvider
EventSourceLoggerProvider
EventLogLoggerProvider

The code-based approach

The obvious way is to start from a clean slate and add back only what you need:

var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);

builder.Logging.ClearProviders();
builder.Logging.AddConsole();

This works, but it’s hardcoded. If you want to change behavior per environment without a new deployment, you need something else.

The configuration-based approach

The logging configuration is read from the Logging section in appsettings.json. Next to the general LogLevel section, you can add a section per provider, using the provider name as the key:

{
  "Logging": {
    "LogLevel": {
      "Default": "Information",
      "Microsoft.AspNetCore": "Warning"
    },
    "Debug": {
      "LogLevel": {
        "Default": "None"
      }
    },
    "EventSource": {
      "LogLevel": {
        "Default": "None"
      }
    },
    "Console": {
      "LogLevel": {
        "Default": "Warning"
      }
    }
  }
}

What did we do here?

  • Debug and EventSource are set to None, so they no longer log anything.
  • Console keeps running, but only for Warning and above.
  • Every other provider falls back to the general LogLevel section.

Remark: Setting the level to None doesn’t remove the provider. It is still registered, but it filters out every message. If you want it gone completely, use ClearProviders().

Once a provider has its own LogLevel section, the general Logging:LogLevel rules are no longer applied to that provider. In the example above, the Microsoft.AspNetCore: Warning rule has no effect on the Console provider. If you still want it there, repeat it:

"Console": {
  "LogLevel": {
    "Default": "Warning",
    "Microsoft.AspNetCore": "Warning"
  }
}

Changing it without touching the code

Because this is plain configuration, you can also override it with environment variables. Use a double underscore as the separator:

Logging__Debug__LogLevel__Default=None
Logging__Console__LogLevel__Default=Warning

This is handy in Azure Container Apps or Kubernetes, where you can change the log level of a single provider without rebuilding your image.

Tip: Provider names are case-insensitive, but they have to match the provider alias: Console, Debug, EventSource and EventLog. A typo is silently ignored, so if nothing changes, check the spelling first.

More information

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...