Skip to main content

Visual Studio finally gets proper Git submodule support

Git submodules wasn't a feature I used that often. Until we started to use it as a way to share context(agent.md) and skills between our projects. That's the moment we discovered that Git submodule support was missing in Visual Studio and we had to fall back to the terminal typing git submodule update --init --recursive

With Visual Studio 18.9, that finally changes. Submodules are now a first-class part of the Git experience in the IDE.

What was missing

Submodules are genuinely useful. They let you pull a shared library, an SDK, or a set of build scripts into your repository without copy-pasting code around. You could fall back to the command line, but the tooling was missing. Visual Studio would show you a submodule as a plain folder, with no indication of its state, no way to add or remove one from the UI, and no understanding of how it related to the parent repository. Every actual submodule operation meant tabbing out to the command line.

What you get now

Open a solution or folder that contains submodules, and Visual Studio discovers and activates them automatically. You'll notice a few things right away:

  • A dedicated Submodules section in the Git Repository window. 
  • Submodule changes show up properly in Git Changes, instead of being invisible or lumped in confusingly.
  • The branch and repository picker understands the parent-child relationship, so you can tell which repository you're actually looking at.

Remark: Submodules are kept out of the main local repositories list on purpose, so your repo picker doesn't turn into a pile of unrelated entries.

Adding, updating, removing

From the Submodules section in the Git Repository window, you can add, update, or remove a submodule directly. No memorized flags, no detour to a terminal. That alone covers most of what used to send people out of the IDE in the first place.

  • Go to the Git –> Manage Branches window

  • Hit the + icon in the Submodules section


  • Specify a Name, Repository URL and Path

  • That’s it!

Now you are good to go to start using the submodule.

Read-only by default

An important detail: most of the time you're consuming a submodule, not editing it. So Visual Studio treats submodules as read-only by default. That's a sensible default, it stops you from accidentally committing a change into a dependency you only meant to reference.

If you do need to work inside a submodule, it's a single setting:

Tools > Options > Source Control > Git > Automatically activate multiple repositories > Yes, include submodules

Flip that, and Visual Studio starts treating the submodule like any other repository you can commit into.

Tip: Leave the default in place unless you have an actual reason to modify the submodule. It's an easy way to avoid a "why did this dependency change" conversation later.

Is this the finished picture?

Not entirely. Microsoft is explicit about this being the first milestone, not the finish line. So far, I like the feature. It covers my day-to-day usage of submodules: discovery, visibility, add/update/remove.

The read-only guardrail makes sense and is a good default.

That's it! If you've been avoiding submodules in Visual Studio because the experience was frustrating, this is worth a second look.

More information

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...