Skip to main content

Breaking Change: The .On() Method in the Latest Copilot SDK

If you're upgrading to the latest version of the Copilot SDK beta, there's a syntax change you need to know about. The .On() method now requires a generic type parameter. As the SDK is still in beta, breaking changes are not unexpected. But this one should be handled with extra care to avoid resource leaks.

This post walks you through what changed, why it matters, and how to update your code.

What changed

In previous versions of the SDK, registering an event handler looked something like this:

// Old syntax
app.On(evt =>
{
    if (ev is AssistantMessageDeltaEvent deltaEvent)
    {
        Console.Write(deltaEvent.Data.DeltaContent);
    }); 
}

In the latest version, the .On() method is now generic. You must explicitly specify the activity or event type you're handling:

// New syntax
using var subscription = app.On<AssistantMessageDeltaEvent>(evt =>
{
    Console.Write(deltaEvent.Data.DeltaContent);
});

The method signature has changed from:

// Before

IDisposable On(SessionEventHandler handler)

// After
IDisposable On<TSessionEvent>(Action<TSessionEvent> handler)

Why you must capture and dispose the return value

This is the part where you can get into trouble when using the updated API

.On<T>() returns an IDisposable — a subscription handle. If you don't hold onto this reference and dispose it properly, you risk:

  • Memory leaks: The handler stays registered indefinitely, holding references that prevent garbage collection.
  • Duplicate handlers: If .On<T>() is called multiple times (e.g., on reconnects or re-initialization), handlers accumulate and fire multiple times per event.
  • Unexpected behavior after shutdown: Handlers may continue firing even after you intend the component to be inactive.

This was also the case with the non-generic.On() method. But I noticed some team members refactor this original implementation (that handles the subscription correctly):

To this(which no longer handles the subscription)

The correct pattern

Use using declarations (C# 8+) or using blocks to ensure deterministic cleanup:

Option 1

// Option 1: using declaration (recommended for scoped lifetime)
using var subscription = app.On<AssistantMessageDeltaEvent>(evt =>
{
    Console.Write(deltaEvent.Data.DeltaContent);
});

Option 2

If you need to capture multiple events in one subscription you can subscribe to the base SessionEvent and still use pattern matching:

// Option 2: using declaration (recommended for scoped lifetime)
using var subscription = app.On<SessionEvent>(evt =>
{
  switch(evt){//Add your pattern matching here}   
}

Summary

The new generic API is a clear improvement and helps to align with the syntax of other language versions(like TypeScript), but it does require a small amount of care around subscription management. The good news is that the pattern is standard C# — if you're already using IDisposable elsewhere in your project, this will feel familiar.

Take the time to audit your existing .On() calls before shipping to production.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...