Skip to main content

Shining a light on .NET versions across our organisation with OpenTelemetry

At our organisation running a large fleet of .NET services, a deceptively simple question can be surprisingly hard to answer: what versions of .NET are our apps actually running in production?

You'd think this would be easy. It isn't. Services get deployed, teams move on, and before long nobody is quite sure whether that one legacy service is still on .NET 6 — or even .NET Core 3.1. Spreadsheets fall out of date. README files lie. The only source of truth is what's actually running.

We solved this with three lines of OpenTelemetry configuration.

The problem

We run dozens of .NET services across multiple teams. We are the middle of a push to .NET 10, but we have no reliable, centralised way to see the current state. We wanted to answer questions like:

  • Which services are still on end-of-life .NET versions?
  • Which teams still have work to do?
  • After a migration wave, how do we confirm everything moved?

The solution

We already had OpenTelemetry set up across all our services, shipping telemetry to Azure Monitor(Application Insights). The key insight was that OpenTelemetry's Resource concept is designed exactly for this kind of thing — it's where you attach metadata that describes what is producing the telemetry, not just what the telemetry says.

We added this to each service's startup code:

That's it. Environment.Version gives you the exact CLR version at runtime — no guessing, no config files, no manual input. It goes straight into the resource attributes on every piece of telemetry that service emits.

Why resource attributes?

You might wonder: why not just log it? Logs get noisy, they require you to remember to emit them, and they're harder to aggregate. Resource attributes, by contrast, are attached to all telemetry from a service — traces, metrics, logs — automatically and consistently. They're designed for exactly this kind of "what is this service?" metadata.

Once the attribute is in Azure Monitor, querying it is straightforward. In Log Analytics you can write a KQL query across your AppDependencies, AppRequests, or AppTraces tables and group by customDimensions["runtime.dotnet.version"] to get a live view of your runtime landscape.

The broader pattern

This is a small example of a broader principle: your observability infrastructure is also your platform visibility infrastructure. OpenTelemetry resource attributes are a low-friction place to attach facts about your services that you want to be able to query and aggregate centrally — runtime version, deployment region, team ownership, feature flags, whatever matters to your org.

The three lines of code above cost almost nothing to add. The visibility they provide is genuinely useful.

More information

.NET Observability with OpenTelemetry - .NET | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.