Skip to main content

GitHub Copilot–Format your code using hooks

After giving a GitHub Copilot training last week where I introduced the concept of hooks, one of the attendants asked me what would be a good example for a hook. Great question!

A first use case I could think of is that we use a hook to format the AI generated code to match the style preferences and static analysis recommendations specified in an .editorconfig file.

Tip: If you are looking for some inspiration, check out the hooks section in Awesome Copilot: awesome-copilot/docs/README.hooks.md at main · github/awesome-copilot

What event should we use?

There are multiple hook events that you can use: sessionStart, sessionEnd, userPromptSubmitted, preToolUse, postToolUse, and errorOccurred. As the formatting should be done after every code change, postToolUse seems the logical choice.

Why not at SessionEnd?

postToolUse formats the file immediately after each edit. This means the agent sees clean, correctly structured usings before it reads the file again for its next step. If the agent inspects the file later in the same session, it's working with already-formatted code, which leads to better decisions.

sessionEnd has a key problem: by the time it runs, the agent has already finished. Any subsequent reads or edits it made during the session were based on the unformatted state. You'd also get a bulk formatting pass at the end, which makes the diff noisier and harder to review — it mixes the agent's logical changes with formatting changes.

Think of it like this: postToolUse is like a formatter running on save, while sessionEnd is like running it only when you close your IDE. The former is almost always more useful.

The one case where sessionEnd could make sense is if dotnet format is slow on your project and you're okay with the trade-offs above, batching it once at the end avoids running it after every single file touch. But dotnet format is fast enough that this isn't usually a concern.

So postToolUse wins here for correctness and agent quality during the session.

Writing our script

Now it’s time to write our script. The approach is simple. The script will be fired after any file edit, it checks if the changed file is a .cs file, and then runs dotnet-format to apply our formatting rules.

Add the script to the following folder: .github/hooks/scripts/format-csharp.ps1

Creating the hook

Almost there! Create a json file with the hook configuration and store it inside the .github/hooks folder. Make sure that the hook correctly points to our script above:

Testing the hook

After you save the hook file, VS Code automatically loads it — no restart needed. Put your agent to work:


You can verify it ran by checking the GitHub Copilot Chat Hooks output channel:

Happy coding!

More information

GitHub Copilot CLI Tips & Tricks — Part 4: Automating and enforcing policies with hooks

dotnet format command - .NET CLI | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.