Skip to main content

Cleaner Minimal API Endpoints with [AsParameters]

I only recently started using the ASP.NET Core's minimal API style, but an annoying thing I already encountered is the "long parameter list" problem. Route handlers that accept five, six, or seven parameters start to feel unwieldy fast. The good news is that a solution exists through the [AsParameters] attribute, introduced in .NET 7,  that gives you a clean way out.

The problem it solves

Minimal APIs are appealing precisely because they're lightweight — no controllers, no ceremony. But that simplicity starts to break down as your endpoints grow more complex. Consider this example endpoint:

That's eight(!) parameters before you've written a single line of business logic. It's hard to read, hard to test, and grows more painful every time requirements change.

Enter [AsParameters]

[AsParameters] lets you group related parameters into a plain C# class or record and bind them all at once. ASP.NET Core inspects the type's constructor and public properties to figure out where each value comes from — route, query string, header, or body — using the same binding rules it always has.

Here's the same endpoint rewritten:

And the parameter object:

The handler signature is immediately easier to scan. The parameter object is independently readable, testable, and reusable across multiple endpoints if needed.

How binding works

[AsParameters] doesn't change the binding rules — it just applies them to the members of your type instead of to the handler's parameter list directly. Each property or constructor parameter is bound according to the usual conventions:

  • Route values bind by name matching a route template segment (e.g., {id})
  • Query string is the default fallback for simple types
  • [FromHeader], [FromRoute], [FromQuery], [FromBody] attributes work exactly as they do on regular parameters

This means you can mix binding sources freely within a single parameter object:

Remark: Records with positional constructors are a natural fit because they're concise and immutable by default. But classes with settable properties work too, and give you more control when you need to mix binding attributes.

A real-world example

Putting it all together — a paginated, filtered product listing endpoint:

Notice that you can use multiple [AsParameters]-decorated parameters on the same handler — a great way to separate concerns like filtering, pagination, and sorting into distinct reusable types.

Wrapping up

[AsParameters] is a small attribute with a meaningful quality-of-life impact. It doesn't fundamentally change how binding works in minimal APIs — it just lets you organize your parameters into proper types instead of cramming everything into the handler signature.

The full binding attribute toolkit ([FromRoute], [FromQuery], [FromHeader], [FromBody]) works seamlessly inside your parameter objects, so you're not giving anything up.

For any endpoint that's grown beyond three or four parameters, it's worth reaching for.

More information

AsParametersAttribute Class (Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http) | Microsoft Learn

Parameter binding in Minimal API applications | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...