Skip to main content

ASP.NET Core - TryParse error when using Minimal APIs

Minimal APIs are the recommended approach for building fast HTTP APIs with ASP.NET Core. They allow you to build fully functioning REST endpoints with minimal code and configuration. You don't need a controller but can just declare your API using a fluent API approach:

This makes it very convenient to build your APIs. However you need to be aware that a lot of magic is going behind the scenes when using this approach. And this magic can bite you in the foot.

Exactly what happened to me while building an autonomous agent invoked through a web hook.

The code

In my application I created the following API endpoint using the minimal API approach:

The minimal API injects an AzureDevOpsWebhookParser that looks like this:

Nothing special…

The problem

The problem was when I called this endpoint, it failed with the following error message:

InvalidOperationException: TryParse method found on AzureDevOpsWebhookParser with incorrect format. Must be a static method with format...

To understand what is going wrong, you need to know how the model binding  conventions work in ASP.NET Core Minimal APIs. If a parameter type has a public static TryParse method with one of the following signatures, the parameter will be bound using TryParse.

As our object doesn't implement such a method, you would think that it wouldn't be a problem. However, starting from .NET 6, a breaking change was introduced that validated the signature of any TryParse method found and throws an InvalidOperationException if it doesn’t match.

The solution

I looked at multiple ways to fix the problem. In the end I landed on a simple solution and just renamed the method to TryParsePayLoad so that the model binding conventions don’t apply.

Remark: While researching a possible solution I discovered the [AsParameters] attribute as a way to group some parameters into one object. But more details in my blog post tomorrow.

More information

Tutorial: Create a Minimal API with ASP.NET Core | Microsoft Learn

APIs overview | Microsoft Learn

Breaking change: TryParse and BindAsync methods are validated | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...