Skip to main content

Disable NuGet Central Package Management for specific projects

Centralized Package Management is a NuGet feature that allows you to manage NuGet package dependencies for multiple projects from a single location. This is particularly useful for large solutions with many projects, as it simplifies the process of keeping package versions consistent across the entire solution.

After enabling Central Package Management for an existing solution and committing those changes, one of our build pipelines started to fail. When we took a look at the logs we encountered the following error message:

##[error]The nuget command failed with exit code(1) and error(NU1008: Projects that use central package version management should not define the version on the PackageReference items but on the PackageVersion items: Dapper;Microsoft.Data.SqlClient;Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration;Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder;Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json;Microsoft.Extensions.Http;Spectre.Console;Spectre.Console.Json.

What is happening?

The reason we got this exception becomes clear when we take a look at our folder structure:

We have one solution sitting at the root (DocumentStorage) folder. But inside the DocumentStorage.Migrator folder we have a second solution with some projects where Central Package Management(CPM) is not enabled yet.

As CPM scans the folders for Directory.Package.props files, it picks up the file found at the root and also tries to use CPM for the solution where this is not yet enabled.

To disable CPM for this specific solution/project, I created a second Directory.Package.props file with the following configuration:

By setting the ManagePackageVersionsCentrally value to false, CPM is disabled and the error disappears.

More information

.NET Upgrade Assistant now supports upgrading to Centralized Package Management

NuGet Central Package Management

Central Package Management | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...