Skip to main content

C# - Set environment in unit tests

When monitoring our RabbitMQ usage, I noticed some strange behavior. After drilling a little bit deeper in our monitoring data, I discovered that the integration tests for one of our projects were running against our production environment! Whoops!!

Luckily the impact was limited but that doesn't mean we don't have to fix it.

The fix

Let me show you how we did it…

The unit test code was using the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing library to create an in-memory test host to test an API. Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing is part of the ASP.NET Core ecosystem and aims to simplify integration testing by providing essential tools and setup.

Here is the original code:

There is nothing wrong with the code itself and it makes it very easy to write and end-to-end integration test against our web app:

One of the api endpoints puts messages on a RabbitMQ queue to process them later. A test instance exists but as I mentioned at the beginning of this post, instead of using the ‘test’ settings found in appsettings.test.json, it was using the production settings.

To fix it I had to update the code to explicitly set the environment:

That's it!

More information

NuGet Gallery | Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing 9.0.2

Integration tests in ASP.NET Core | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...