Skip to main content

Implementing an OAuth client credentials flow with ADFS–Part 2–Application configuration

It looked like most of the world has made the switch to Microsoft Entra(Azure Active Directory). However one of my clients is still using ADFS. Unfortunately there isn't much information left on how to get an OAuth flow up and running in ADFS. Most of the links I found point to documentation that no longer exists. So therefore this short blog series to show you end-to-end how to get an OAuth Client Credentials flow configured in ADFS.

Part 1 - ADFS configuration

Part 2 (this post) – Application configuration

After doing all the configuration work in ADFS, I’ll focus today on the necessary work that needs to be done on the application side.

Configuring the API

We’ll start by configuring the API part.

  • First create a new ASP.NET Core API project

dotnet new webapi --use-controllers -o ExampleApi

dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer

  • Add the authentication configuration:
  • As you can see, in the code above we need to configure the following values:
    • MetadataAddress: the discovery endpoint where the metadata is published, this typically is an URL that ends with .well-known/openid-configuration
    • Authority: the OAuth server url, in our case this is our ADFS instance
    • Audience: the configured identifier for our API (see the previous post)
    • ValidIssuer: the issuer that will be checked against the token issuer
  • Almost there! As a last step, we need to add the middleware:

OK, now that we are done with the API side, let’s focus on the client.

Configuring the client

On the client side I would typically recommend to use a library like MSAL.NET.  It can help you a lot in simplifying the configuration process.

But as we are using a very simple flow, we’ll only use the built-in HttpClient.

  • Create a new Console application

dotnet new console –o ExampleClient

  • We first need to make a request to the token endpoint in ADFS:
  • This access token can now be used to call the API:

If everything goes well, you should see the following output in your API:

 


More information

NuGet Gallery | Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer 8.0.10

Microsoft Authentication Library for .NET - Microsoft Authentication Library for .NET | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...