Skip to main content

Implementing an OAuth client credentials flow with ADFS–Part 3–Debugging the flow

It looked like most of the world has made the switch to Microsoft Entra(Azure Active Directory). However one of my clients is still using ADFS. Unfortunately there isn't much information left on how to get an OAuth flow up and running in ADFS. Most of the links I found point to documentation that no longer exists. So therefore this short blog series to show you end-to-end how to get an OAuth Client Credentials flow configured in ADFS.

Part 1 - ADFS configuration

Part 2 – Application configuration

Part 3 (this post) – Debugging the flow

In the first 2 posts I showed you the happy path. So if you did everything exactly as I showed, you should end up with a working Client Credentials flow in ADFS. Unfortunately there are a lot of small details that matter, and if you make one mistake you’ll end with a wide range of possible errors.

In today’s post, I focus on the preparation work to help us debug the process and better understand what is going on.

Updating your OAuth Configuration to improve the debugging experience

The trick to understand what is going is to register to the different events that are triggered by the authentication middleware. ASP.NET Core uses a standardized approach so what I’m showing here can also be applied to other types of authentication(although the specific events and parameters can differ).

In our case we need to provide a JwtBearerEvents instance where we can subscribe to the following events:

  • OnAuthenticationFailed : Invoked if authentication fails during request processing. The exceptions will be re-thrown after this event unless suppressed.
  • OnChallenge : Invoked before a challenge is sent back to the caller.
  • OnForbidden : Invoked if Authorization fails and results in a Forbidden response.
  • OnMessageReceived : Invoked when a protocol message is first received.
  • OnTokenValidated : Invoked after the security token has passed validation and a ClaimsIdentity has been generated.

Here is an example implementation where I output the parameters to the console:

We’ll use this class in our next post to capture any error and better understand what is going wrong.

More information

IJwtBearerEvents Interface (Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer) | Microsoft Learn

Popular posts from this blog

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cleaner switch expressions with pattern matching in C#

Ever find yourself mapping multiple string values to the same result? Being a C# developer for a long time, I sometimes forget that the C# has evolved so I still dare to chain case labels or reach for a dictionary. Of course with pattern matching this is no longer necessary. With pattern matching, you can express things inline, declaratively, and with zero repetition. A small example I was working on a small script that should invoke different actions depending on the environment. As our developers were using different variations for the same environment e.g.  "tst" alongside "test" , "prd" alongside "prod" .  We asked to streamline this a long time ago, but as these things happen, we still see variations in the wild. This brought me to the following code that is a perfect example for pattern matching: The or keyword here is a logical pattern combinator , not a boolean operator. It matches if either of the specified pattern...