Skip to main content

EF Core–Read and write models

Today I was working with a team that was implementing a CQRS architecture. CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) is a design pattern that separates the responsibilities of reading and writing data into distinct models. The idea is to use one model to handle commands (which modify data) and another model to handle queries (which retrieve data). This separation allows for better scalability, performance optimization, and flexibility, as the read and write operations can be independently optimized or scaled based on the specific needs of the system.




After creating a read model for a specific table in the database, EF core started to complain and returned the following error message:

System.InvalidOperationException : Cannot use table 'Categories' for entity type 'CategoryReadModel since it is being used for entity type 'Category' and potentially other entity types, but there is no linking relationship. Add a foreign key to 'CategoryReadModel' on the primary key properties and pointing to the primary key on another entity type mapped to 'Categories'.

As mentioned in the error above, both the Category entity and the CategoryReadModel where mapped to the same table 'Categories'. Here is the corresponding code:

It turns out that EF Core doesn’t support mapping to entities to the same table what explains the error message above.

So mapping both a read and write model in this way seems to be a problem…

How to fix this?

One way to fix this, is to create 2 separate DbContext; one that is used for your read model and a separate one that is used for your write models. The advantage of this approach is that it provides clear separation at the cost of an increased application  complexity.

In this case we decided to go for a simpler alternative. As the read model is a readonly version of the table, we updated the mapping and indicated that the Categories table should be handled like a view for the CategoryReadModel.

Here is the updated code:

More information

Entity Types - EF Core | Microsoft Learn

The Fluent API ToView Method (learnentityframeworkcore.com)

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Azure DevOps/ GitHub emoji

I’m really bad at remembering emoji’s. So here is cheat sheet with all emoji’s that can be used in tools that support the github emoji markdown markup: All credits go to rcaviers who created this list.

VS Code Planning mode

After the introduction of Plan mode in Visual Studio , it now also found its way into VS Code. Planning mode, or as I like to call it 'Hannibal mode', extends GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode capabilities to handle larger, multi-step coding tasks with a structured approach. Instead of jumping straight into code generation, Planning mode creates a detailed execution plan. If you want more details, have a look at my previous post . Putting plan mode into action VS Code takes a different approach compared to Visual Studio when using plan mode. Instead of a configuration setting that you can activate but have limited control over, planning is available as a separate chat mode/agent: I like this approach better than how Visual Studio does it as you have explicit control when plan mode is activated. Instead of immediately diving into execution, the plan agent creates a plan and asks some follow up questions: You can further edit the plan by clicking on ‘Open in Editor’: ...