Skip to main content

GraphQL–HotChocolate - The object type `Object` has to at least define one field in order to be valid.

A colleague contacted me last week asking help with a specific HotChocolate issue they got. He shared the code and the error message with me.

Here is the error he got:

1. The object type `Object` has to at least define one field in order to be valid. (HotChocolate.Types.ObjectType<System.Object>)
      HotChocolate.SchemaException: For more details look at the `Errors` property.
      1. The object type `Object` has to at least define one field in order to be valid. (HotChocolate.Types.ObjectType<System.Object>)
         at HotChocolate.Configuration.TypeInitializer.Initialize()
         at HotChocolate.SchemaBuilder.Setup.InitializeTypes(SchemaBuilder builder, IDescriptorContext context, IReadOnlyList`1 types)
         at HotChocolate.SchemaBuilder.Setup.Create(SchemaBuilder builder, LazySchema lazySchema, IDescriptorContext context)
         at HotChocolate.SchemaBuilder.Create(IDescriptorContext context)
         at HotChocolate.SchemaBuilder.HotChocolate.ISchemaBuilder.Create(IDescriptorContext context)
         at HotChocolate.Execution.RequestExecutorResolver.CreateSchemaAsync(ConfigurationContext context, RequestExecutorSetup setup, RequestExecutorOptions executorOptions, IServiceProvider schemaServices, TypeModuleChangeMonitor typeModuleChangeMonitor, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
         at HotChocolate.Execution.RequestExecutorResolver.CreateSchemaServicesAsync(ConfigurationContext context, RequestExecutorSetup setup, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
         at HotChocolate.Execution.RequestExecutorResolver.GetRequestExecutorNoLockAsync(String schemaName, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
         at HotChocolate.Execution.RequestExecutorResolver.GetRequestExecutorAsync(String schemaName, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
         at HotChocolate.Execution.RequestExecutorProxy.GetRequestExecutorAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
         at HotChocolate.AspNetCore.HttpPostMiddlewareBase.HandleRequestAsync(HttpContext context)
         at HotChocolate.AspNetCore.HttpPostMiddlewareBase.InvokeAsync(HttpContext context)
         at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder.EndpointRouteBuilderExtensions.<>c__DisplayClass20_0.<<UseCancellation>b__1>d.MoveNext()
      --- End of stack trace from previous location ---
         at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Routing.EndpointMiddleware.<Invoke>g__AwaitRequestTask|6_0(Endpoint endpoint, Task requestTask, ILogger logger)
         at GrowingActivitiesRegistrations.Api.Middleware.GlobalExceptionHandlingMiddleware.InvokeAsync(HttpContext context, RequestDelegate next) in /GrowingActivitiesRegistrations/src/GrowingActivitiesRegistrations.Api/Middleware/GlobalExceptionHandlingMiddleware.cs:line 21

The error message is coming from the built-in type validation. HotChocolate does multiple checks to validate if your GraphQL schema is correct. One of these checks is to validate if your ObjectType has at least one field defined.

It is exactly this check that fails. As it is doing this check on a class of type ‘Object’, a type that has no fields defined, it makes sense that  we got this error.

So the real question is why is HotChocolate thinking that we have an ObjectType of type ‘Object’?

Let’s have a look at the code!

I was able to pinpoint the issue to the following ObjectType definition:

And more specifically to the ‘Choices’ field. The moment this field was added we got into trouble:

As we didn’t specify an explicit mapping for the Choice type, HotChocolate will infer an ObjectType mapping for us. So let’s have a look at the Choice class:

Do you notice the problem? The Choice class inherits from ValueObject that exposes a GetAtomicValues function that returns an IEnumerable<Object>. That explains where the error is coming from.

To fix it we can create an explicit ObjectType for Choice where we ignore the GetAtomicValues function:

We also have to update the Choices field to return the correct type:

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...
Read more

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...
Read more

The role of ActivitySource in OpenTelemetry for .NET

While doing some pair programming to integrate OpenTelemetry tracing to a .NET application, we had a discussion on how to use the ActivitySource . It looks simple. You new one up, give it a name, start an activity, done. The discussion started when we added a second ActivitySource with the exact same name in a different class. This made us wonder: "Are we duplicating traces now? Is this a memory leak? Do we need a singleton?" So we decided to dig deeper. This post is what we learned… What ActivitySource actually is ActivitySource is part of System.Diagnostics , not part of the OpenTelemetry NuGet packages. Microsoft built tracing primitives directly into the BCL, and OpenTelemetry's .NET SDK simply listens to them. This is why you can add distributed tracing to a library without taking a dependency on OpenTelemetry at all. An ActivitySource is a factory for Activity objects, and an Activity is .NET's name for what OpenTelemetry calls a span.(don’t ask m...
Read more