Skip to main content

Monitor RabbitMQ metrics in ElasticSearch

One of the reasons we are using ElasticSearch is to bring all the metrics from multiple systems together in one place. One of the systems we want to monitor is our RabbitMQ cluster. Let's walk through the steps to get our RabbitMQ metrics send to ElasticSearch and available in Kibana.

The RabbitMQ Metrics Integration

Open up Kibana and click on the hamburger icon in the left corner. This will open up a side menu with a big ‘Add integrations’ button at the bottom.

Hit this button to go to the Integrations overview page. Here you can see the list of all available integrations.

Let’s search for “rabbitmq”. We get 2 results back.

Click on the ‘RabbitMQ Metrics’ integration to go to the installation instructions.

Install MetricBeat on Windows

The RabbitMQ metrics integration is part of MetricBeat. MetricBeat is a lightweight shipper that you can install on your servers to periodically collect metrics from the operating system and from services running on those servers (or containers).

Let’s first download MetricBeat and extract the zip file on the server(s) where your RabbitMQ cluster is running. Go to the folder where you extracted the zip and run the following command

PS C:\Windows\system32> cd "C:\Program Files\Elastic\Beats\8.2.0\MetricBeat"

PS C:\Program Files\Elastic\Beats\8.2.0\MetricBeat> .\install-service-metricbeat.ps1

The output should look like this:

Status   Name               DisplayName

------   ----               -----------

Stopped  metricbeat         metricbeat

Next step is to enable the rabbitmq module to start collecting information from our RabbitMQ cluster.

PS C:\Program Files\Elastic\Beats\8.2.0\MetricBeat> .\metricbeat.exe modules enable rabbitmq

Enabled rabbitmq

Almost there! As a last step we still need to create the necessary indices. This can be done through the following command:

PS C:\Program Files\Elastic\Beats\8.2.0\MetricBeat> .\metricbeat.exe setup

Overwriting ILM policy is disabled. Set `setup.ilm.overwrite: true` for enabling.

Index setup finished.

Loading dashboards (Kibana must be running and reachable)

Loaded dashboards

On the installation instructions page, we can check that everything is working by hitting the ‘Check data’ button.

Now we can click on the RabbitMQ Metrics Dashboard button to go to the dashboard.

Here we can find some default information about our cluster. Of course you are free to customize this dashboard to your needs.

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...