Skip to main content

Azure Application Insights– Collect Performance counters data

One of the features you get out-of-the-box when using Application Insights is the ability to collect performance counter data. This allows you to track statistics like CPU, memory and disk usage.

In ASP.NET Core the following counters are collected by default:

  • % Process\Processor Time
  • % Process\Processor Time Normalized
  • Memory\Available Bytes
  • Process\Private Bytes
  • Process\IO Data Bytes/sec
  • Processor(_Total)\% Processor Time

When the performance counters are collected correctly, you can use them as one of the available metrics in Application Insights:

Troubleshooting performance counters collection

But what if no data is returned?

First thing you should check, if you have a related log message. Therefore run the following KQL query inside the Logs section:

traces
| where message startswith "AI: Error collecting"
| limit 10


In my case it returned the following error message:

AI: Error collecting 6 of the configured performance counters. Please check the configuration.
Counter \Process(??APP_WIN32_PROC??)\% Processor Time: Access to the registry key 'Global' is denied.
Counter \Process(??APP_WIN32_PROC??)\% Processor Time Normalized: Access to the registry key 'Global' is denied.
Counter \Process(??APP_WIN32_PROC??)\Private Bytes: Access to the registry key 'Global' is denied.
Counter \Memory\Available Bytes: Failed to register performance counter. Category: Memory, counter: Available Bytes, instance: .
Counter \Process(??APP_WIN32_PROC??)\IO Data Bytes/sec: Access to the registry key 'Global' is denied.
Counter \Processor(_Total)\% Processor Time: Failed to register performance counter. Category: Processor, counter: % Processor Time, instance: _Total.

This error message rang a bel and a search on my blog returned the following post from 2019:

https://bartwullems.blogspot.com/2019/09/access-to-registry-key-global-is-denied.html

To solve the issue, we have to add the Application Pool user(use the following name: IIS AppPool\<applicationpool name>) to both the Performance Monitor users and Performance Log Users group.  After doing that, the error should disappear.

Remark: Don’t forget to restart the application pool after adding the user

Popular posts from this blog

Podman– Command execution failed with exit code 125

After updating WSL on one of the developer machines, Podman failed to work. When we took a look through Podman Desktop, we noticed that Podman had stopped running and returned the following error message: Error: Command execution failed with exit code 125 Here are the steps we tried to fix the issue: We started by running podman info to get some extra details on what could be wrong: >podman info OS: windows/amd64 provider: wsl version: 5.3.1 Cannot connect to Podman. Please verify your connection to the Linux system using `podman system connection list`, or try `podman machine init` and `podman machine start` to manage a new Linux VM Error: unable to connect to Podman socket: failed to connect: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:2655: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. That makes sense as the podman VM was not running. Let’s check the VM: >podman machine list NAME         ...

Cache stampede: when our cache turned against us

While investigating some performance issues, we ran into an ASP.NET Core API that cached a fairly expensive aggregation query for 60 seconds. Under normal load, that was fine: one request rebuilds the cache, everyone else reads from it. Under peak load, dozens of requests would arrive in that same expiry window, all see a cache miss, and all fire the same expensive query in parallel. The database didn't like that. That was the moment when our caching layer stopped helping and started hurting. A burst of requests comes in at the same time, all miss the cache, and all go hammer the database or the downstream API at once. That's a cache stampede . The cache was supposed to protect our backend, and for a few hundred milliseconds it did the opposite. Why this happens IMemoryCache.GetOrCreate (and its async sibling) looks like it protects you, but it doesn't add any locking on its own. Look at the naive version: public async Task<Report> GetReportAsync(string key) ...

A complex system designed from scratch never works

A few years ago, I worked as an architect on a big mainframe rewrite. I still count it as one of my failures. Not because the technology was wrong, but because I couldn't convince the management team to simplify the approach. Years later, the organization is still struggling to get the new system up and running. I left the project at the time, because I couldn't put my name behind an approach that would take very long and cost a lot of money without a working system to show for it along the way. Gall’s Law That memory keeps coming back to me, because it's a textbook case of Gall's Law playing out in real life. Gall's Law , from John Gall's Systemantics , states it plainly: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works, and it cannot be patched to make it work. You have to start over with a simple system that works. What does that mean in practice,...